Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026274›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021

The toxic effect of CuO of different dispersion degrees on the structure and ultrastructure of spring barley cells (Hordeum sativum distichum).

Aleksei G Fedorenko, Tatiana M Minkina, Natalia P Chernikova, Grigoriy M Fedorenko, Saglara S Mandzhieva, Vishnu D Rajput, Marina V Burachevskaya, Victor A Chaplygin, Tatiana V Bauer, Svetlana N Sushkova and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Special Issue on "Metallophytes for soil remediation" - Preface.Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksei G FedorenkoSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Tatiana M MinkinaSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006. tminkina@mail.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-0883
Natalia P ChernikovaSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Grigoriy M FedorenkoSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Saglara S MandzhievaSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Vishnu D RajputSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Marina V BurachevskayaSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Victor A ChaplyginSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Tatiana V BauerSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Svetlana N SushkovaSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Aleksandr V SoldatovSouthern Federal University, 105 Bolshaya Sadovaya Str., Rostov-on-Don, Russia, 344006.
Southern Federal University · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

Russian Scientific Foundation 19-74-10046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nowadays, nanotechnology is one of the most dynamically developing and most promising technologies. However, the safety issues of using metal nanoparticles, their environmental impact on soil and plants are poorly understood. These studies are especially important in terms of copper-based nanomaterials because they are widely used in agriculture. Concerning that, it is important to study the mechanism behind the mode of CuO nanoparticles action at the ultrastructural intracellular level. It is established that the contamination with CuO has had a negative influence on the development of spring barley. A greater toxic effect has been exerted by the introduction of CuO nanoparticles as compared to the macrodispersed form. A comparative analysis of the toxic effects of copper oxides and nano-oxides on plants has shown changes in the tissue and intracellular levels in the barley roots. However, qualitative changes in plant leaves have not practically been observed. In general, conclusions can be made that copper oxide in nano-dispersed form penetrates better from the soil into the plant and can accumulate in large quantities in it.

Indexed as

CopperHordeumMetal NanoparticlesOxidesPlant LeavesSeasonsSoil PollutantsCoppercupric oxideOxidesSoil PollutantsCellCu oxideNanoparticlesPlantsSoilSpring barleyTEMToxic effect

Identifiers

PMID32026274
OpenAlexW3005458131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.