Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32026205›Full record

ArticlePituitary2020

Expression patterns of ERα66 and its novel variant isoform ERα36 in lactotroph pituitary adenomas and associations with clinicopathological characteristics.

Fatemeh Mahboobifard, Farahnaz Bidari-Zerehpoosh, Zahra Davoudi, Mahshid Panahi, Leila Dargahi, Mohammad H Pourgholami, Gieve Sharifi, Neda Izadi, Masoumeh Jorjani

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pituitary, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Fatemeh MahboobifardDepartment of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farahnaz Bidari-ZerehpooshDepartment of Pathology, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Zahra DavoudiSkull Base Research Center, Loghman Hakim Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
Mahshid PanahiDepartment of Pathology, Firoozgar Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Leila DargahiNeuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad H PourgholamiDepartment of Physiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Gieve SharifiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Neda IzadiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Safety, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Masoumeh JorjaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Neurobiology Research Center, School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Velenjak, Tehran, Iran. msjorjani@sbmu.ac.ir.
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IRIran University of Medical Sciences · IRShahid Beheshti University · IRTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

The School of Medicine and Neuroscience Research Center A-A-725.1-1395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe regulatory effects of estradiol on pituitary homeostasis have been well documented. However, the expression patterns of ERα66 and ERα36 and their correlations with the clinical course of postoperative prolactinoma tumors remain unclear.

methodsThe expression of ERα36, ERα66, Ki67, p53, and CD31 were determined by immunohistochemistry in 62 prolactinoma patients. Snap-frozen tumors and normal pituitaries were also examined by western blotting for estrogen receptor detection.

resultsA broad expression of ERα36 was identified in normal pituitaries. The median scores of ERα36 and ERα66 expression were 8 and 6 in normal pituitaries and 4 and 0 in tumors, respectively. Four phenotypes of ERα36 and ERα66 expression were explored in tumors with regard to sex, invasiveness, dopamine resistance, and recurrence. Low ERα36 expression was associated with tumor invasion and increased Ki67. Low ERα66 expression was associated with tumor invasion, dopamine-agonist resistance, and enhanced tumor size. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that low ERα36 expression is an independent risk factor for invasiveness. The significant inverse association of ERα66 with invasiveness, dopamine resistance, and tumor size remained significant after adjustment for sex as a potential confounder. After controlling for sex, the low ERα66/low ERα36 phenotype was 6.24 times more prevalent in invasive tumors than in noninvasive tumors. Although the decreasing trend of CD31 expression from surrounding nontumoral lactotroph adenomas to tumors was similar to that of the estrogen receptors, a significant correlation was not observed here.

conclusionThe decreasing trends of ERα36 and ERα66 expression from normal pituitaries to tumors are associated with aggressive clinical behavior.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBlotting, WesternEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansImmunohistochemistryKi-67 AntigenMaleMiddle AgedPituitary NeoplasmsPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1ProlactinomaProtein IsoformsBiomarkersESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaestrogen receptor alpha 36, humanKi-67 AntigenMKI67 protein, humanPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Protein IsoformsClinicopathologyERα36ERα66Lactotroph adenomaPituitaryProlactinoma

Identifiers

PMID32026205
OpenAlexW3008546265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.