Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025985›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2020

Image-guided breast biopsy and localisation: recommendations for information to women and referring physicians by the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Ulrich Bick, Rubina M Trimboli, Alexandra Athanasiou, Corinne Balleyguier, Pascal A T Baltzer, Maria Bernathova, Krisztina Borbély, Boris Brkljacic, Luca A Carbonaro, Paola Clauser and 32 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 177 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Selection of Breast Biopsy Markers: Effect on Breast Imaging Procedures, Follow-up, and Costs.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors at 20 institutions in 17 countries.

Ulrich BickClinic of Radiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Rubina M TrimboliPhD Course in Integrative Biomedical Research, Department of Biomedical Science for Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Mangiagalli, 31, 20133, Milan, Italy.
Alexandra AthanasiouBreast Imaging Department, MITERA Hospital, 6, Erithrou Stavrou Str. 151 23 Marousi, Athens, Greece.
Corinne BalleyguierDepartment of Radiology, Gustave-Roussy Cancer Campus, 114 Rue Edouard Vaillant, 94800, Villejuif, France.
Pascal A T BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Maria BernathovaDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Krisztina BorbélyMH EK Honvédkórház, Róbert károly krt. 44, Budapest, 1134, Hungary.
Boris BrkljacicDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Dubrava, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Luca A CarbonaroUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Paola ClauserDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Enrico CassanoBreast Imaging Division, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
Catherine ColinRadiology Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Femme Mère Enfant, 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69 677, Bron Cedex, France.
Gul EsenSchool of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Andrew EvansDundee Cancer Centre, Clinical Research Centre, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Tom McDonald Avenue, Dundee, UK.
Eva M FallenbergDiagnostic and Interventional Breast Imaging, Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
Michael H FuchsjaegerDivision of General Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical University Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 9, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Fiona J GilbertDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Thomas H HelbichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Sylvia H Heywang-KöbrunnerReferenzzentrum Mammographie München and FFB gGmbH München, Sonnenstraße 29, 80331, Munich, Germany.
Michel HerranzCyclotronUnit, GALARIA-SERGAS, Nuclear Medicine Department and Molecular ImagingGroup, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (IDIS), Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Karen KinkelInstitut de Radiologie, Clinique des Grangettes, Chemin des Grangettes 7, 1224 Chêne-Bougeries, Genève, Switzerland.
Fleur Kilburn-ToppinDepartment of Radiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Christiane K KuhlUniversity Hospital of Aachen, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Germany.
Mihai LesaruRadiology and Imaging Laboratory, Fundeni Institute, Bucharest, Romania.
Marc B I LobbesDepartment of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Dr. H. van der Hoffplein 1, PO Box 5500, 6130 MB, Sittard-Geleen, The Netherlands.
Ritse M MannDepartment of Radiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Laura MartincichUnit of Radiodiagnostics ASL AT, Via Conte Verde 125, 14100, Asti, Italy.
Pietro PanizzaBreast Imaging Unit, Scientific Institute (IRCCS) Ospedale San Raffaele, Via Olgettina, 60, 20132, Milan, Italy.
Federica PediconiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Viale Regina Elena, 324, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Ruud M PijnappelDepartment of Imaging, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Katja PinkerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Division of Molecular and Gender Imaging, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090, Wien, Austria.
Simone SchiaffinoUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy.
Tamar SellaDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraDepartment of Radiology, Sorbonne Université, APHP, Hôpital Tenon, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020, Paris, France.
Anne TardivonDepartment of Radiology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
Chantal Van OngevalDepartment of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Matthew G WallisCambridge Breast Unit and NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, Box 97, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK.
Sophia ZackrissonDiagnostic Radiology, Department of Translational Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Skåne University Hospital Malmö, SE-205 02, Malmö, Sweden.
Gabor ForraiDepartment of Radiology, Duna Medical Center, Budapest, Hungary.
Julia Camps HerreroJefa Corporativa del Área de la Mama, Ribera Salud Grupo, Valencia, Spain.
Francesco SardanelliUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, San Donato Milanese, Milan, Italy. francesco.sardanelli@unimi.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6545-9427
European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI), with language review by Europa Donna–The European Breast Cancer Coalition
University of Milan · ITUniversity of Cambridge · GBHadassah Medical Center · ILHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRLund University · SEMedical University of Graz · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNinewells Hospital · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of Zagreb · HRAzienda Sanitaria Locale di Asti · ITBuda Health Center · HUCambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEEuropean Institute of Oncology · ITHirslanden Clinique des Grangettes · CHInstitut Curie · FRInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We summarise here the information to be provided to women and referring physicians about percutaneous breast biopsy and lesion localisation under imaging guidance. After explaining why a preoperative diagnosis with a percutaneous biopsy is preferred to surgical biopsy, we illustrate the criteria used by radiologists for choosing the most appropriate combination of device type for sampling and imaging technique for guidance. Then, we describe the commonly used devices, from fine-needle sampling to tissue biopsy with larger needles, namely core needle biopsy and vacuum-assisted biopsy, and how mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, or magnetic resonance imaging work for targeting the lesion for sampling or localisation. The differences among the techniques available for localisation (carbon marking, metallic wire, radiotracer injection, radioactive seed, and magnetic seed localisation) are illustrated. Type and rate of possible complications are described and the issue of concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is also addressed. The importance of pathological-radiological correlation is highlighted: when evaluating the results of any needle sampling, the radiologist must check the concordance between the cytology/pathology report of the sample and the radiological appearance of the biopsied lesion. We recommend that special attention is paid to a proper and tactful approach when communicating to the woman the need for tissue sampling as well as the possibility of cancer diagnosis, repeat tissue sampling, and or even surgery when tissue sampling shows a lesion with uncertain malignant potential (also referred to as "high-risk" or B3 lesions). Finally, seven frequently asked questions are answered.

Indexed as

BreastBreast lesion localisationCore needle biopsyFine-needle samplingVacuum-assisted biopsy

Identifiers

PMID32025985
PMCPMC7002629
OpenAlexW2994827046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.