ReviewMedical microbiology and immunology2020
New solutions to capture and enrich bacteria from complex samples.
Review in Medical microbiology and immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid culture-free diagnosis of clinical pathogens via integrated microfluidic-Raman micro-spectroscopy.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Aptamer decorated PDA@magnetic silica microparticles for bacteria purification.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Article
- Acoustofluidics-enhanced biosensing with simultaneously high sensitivity and speed.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Polyaniline-based 3D network structure promotes entrapment and detection of drug-resistant bacteria.Nano convergence · 2023Article
- Multifunctional Composite Hydrogels for Bacterial Capture, Growth/Elimination, and Sensing Applications.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2022Review
- Clay chips and beads capture in situ barley root microbiota and facilitate in vitro long-term preservation of microbial strains.FEMS microbiology ecology · 2022Article
- Novel Biorecognition Elements against Pathogens in the Design of State-of-the-Art Diagnostics.Biosensors · 2021Review
- Antimicrobial Peptides as Probes in Biosensors Detecting Whole Bacteria: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current solutions to diagnose bacterial infections though reliable are often time-consuming, laborious and need a specific laboratory setting. There is an unmet need for bedside accurate diagnosis of infectious diseases with a short turnaround time. Moreover, low-cost diagnostics will greatly benefit regions with poor resources. Immunoassays and molecular techniques have been used to develop highly sensitive diagnosis solutions but retaining many of the abovementioned limitations. The detection of bacteria in a biological sample can be enhanced by a previous step of capture and enrichment. This will ease the following process enabling a more sensitive detection and increasing the possibility of a conclusive identification in the downstream diagnosis. This review explores the latest developments regarding the initial steps of capture and enrichment of bacteria from complex samples with the ultimate goal of designing low cost and reliable diagnostics for bacterial infections. Some solutions use specific ligands tethered to magnetic constructs for separation under magnetic fields, microfluidic platforms and engineered nano-patterned surfaces to trap bacteria. Bulk acoustics, advection and nano-filters comprise some of the most innovative solutions for bacteria enrichment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.