Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025832›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2020

A quantitative model based on clinically relevant MRI features differentiates lower grade gliomas and glioblastoma.

Hang Cao, E Zeynep Erson-Omay, Xuejun Li, Murat Günel, Jennifer Moliterno, Robert K Fulbright

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hang CaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
E Zeynep Erson-OmayDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Xuejun LiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China.
Murat GünelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Jennifer MoliternoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Robert K FulbrightDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, MRRC, Yale School of Medicine, The Anlyan Center N137, PO Box 208043, New Haven, CT, 06520-8043, USA. robert.fulbright@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8204-3594
Yale University · USCentral South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo establish a quantitative MR model that uses clinically relevant features of tumor location and tumor volume to differentiate lower grade glioma (LRGG, grades II and III) and glioblastoma (GBM, grade IV).

methodsWe extracted tumor location and tumor volume (enhancing tumor, non-enhancing tumor, peritumor edema) features from 229 The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LGG and TCGA-GBM cases. Through two sampling strategies, i.e., institution-based sampling and repeat random sampling (10 times, 70% training set vs 30% validation set), LASSO (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator) regression and nine-machine learning method-based models were established and evaluated.

resultsPrincipal component analysis of 229 TCGA-LGG and TCGA-GBM cases suggested that the LRGG and GBM cases could be differentiated by extracted features. For nine machine learning methods, stack modeling and support vector machine achieved the highest performance (institution-based sampling validation set, AUC > 0.900, classifier accuracy > 0.790; repeat random sampling, average validation set AUC > 0.930, classifier accuracy > 0.850). For the LASSO method, regression model based on tumor frontal lobe percentage and enhancing and non-enhancing tumor volume achieved the highest performance (institution-based sampling validation set, AUC 0.909, classifier accuracy 0.830). The formula for the best performance of the LASSO model was established.

conclusionsComputer-generated, clinically meaningful MRI features of tumor location and component volumes resulted in models with high performance (validation set AUC > 0.900, classifier accuracy > 0.790) to differentiate lower grade glioma and glioblastoma. KEY POINTS: • Lower grade glioma and glioblastoma have significant different location and component volume distributions. • We built machine learning prediction models that could help accurately differentiate lower grade gliomas and GBM cases. We introduced a fast evaluation model for possible clinical differentiation and further analysis.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAdultBrain NeoplasmsDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGlioblastomaGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeoplasm StagingSupport Vector MachineTumor BurdenGliomaMachine learningNeoplasm gradingTumor burden

Identifiers

PMID32025832
OpenAlexW3004715708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.