ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2020
[Experiences of aggression and violence against ophthalmologists].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characteristics of patients dismissed from a retina practice.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- [The most serious incident-Experiences of aggression and violence in ophthalmology].Die Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe media have reported an increased willingness of patients and relatives to use violence against medical personnel. So far a few studies have been carried out on this topic and the data situation is correspondingly weak. Ophthalmologists in particular have close contact with patients at the slit lamp and are often alone with patients.
methodsA questionnaire was developed based on the perception of prevalence of aggression scale (POPAS) questionnaire and the survey on aggression and violence among general practitioners. In autumn 2018, all members of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Professional Association of Ophthalmologists (BVA) received an invitation by e‑mail to complete the questionnaire online.
resultsOf the 9411 ophthalmologists contacted a total of 1508 (age 49 ± 12 years) took part in the survey (16%). Of the respondents 806 (53.7%) were female and 1139 (75.5%) participants worked in practices. A total of 1264 (83.3%) ophthalmologists had experienced aggression/violence in their work, 986 (65%) respondents had already experienced verbal assaults without threats, 363 (24.1%) doctors reported experiences with threats of physical violence and 30 (2%) participants had received medical treatment for severe physical violence. Sexual intimidation/harassment was affirmed by 322 (21.4%) of respondents, of whom 243 (75.5%) were female and 533 (47.9%) doctors felt that aggressive/violent behavior had increased in the last 5 years.
conclusionThe high number of participants indicates the high relevance of the topic. The survey produced astonishing results, which should lead to further discussion and action to improve the safety of employees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.