Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025788›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Psychological distress and nutritional status in head and neck cancer patients: a pilot study.

Maja Gosak, Kaja Gradišar, Nada Rotovnik Kozjek, Primož Strojan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Diagnostic and prognostic utility of phase angle in patients with cancer.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2023
    Review
  8. Influence of fat-free mass index on the survival of patients with head and neck cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Impact of depressive disorders on quality of life after middle ear surgery in patients with chronic otitis media.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Maja GosakDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Zaloška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Kaja GradišarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Zaloška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nada Rotovnik KozjekClinical Nutrition Unit, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Primož StrojanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Zaloška 2, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia. pstrojan@onko-i.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0445-112X

Funding

Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS P3-0307
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether the psychological state of patients with head and neck cancer (HCN) is associated with their nutritional status.

methodsIn 40 patients with locally advanced HNC treated with definitive or adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy, psychological and nutritional status were assessed before treatment, at its completion and 3 months' post-therapy. Psychosocial distress was measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale questionnaire (HADS-A, HADS-D), whereas the nutritional status was evaluated using standard methods (Nutritional Risk Screening Tool 2002, anthropometric data, dynamometry and laboratory tests) and with a bioelectrical impedance analysis parameter phase angle (PA).

resultsBefore treatment, more patients were screened positive for anxiety than at treatment completion (p = 0.037) or 3 months' post-therapy (p = 0.083). Depression prevalence was non-significantly higher at the end and after therapy. Compared to the baseline, more cachectic patients and a reduction of PA values were found at successive assessments. Anxiety was more often recorded among malnourished/cachectic patients (assessment 1, p = 0.017; assessment 2, p = 0.020) who were also found more frequently depressed (assessment 2, p = 0.045; assessment 3, p = 0.023). Significantly higher PA values were measured in patients without distress determined at 3 months' post-therapy by the HADS-A (p = 0.027).

conclusionThe association between the psychological and nutritional status found in this pilot study and the options for intervention warrants further clarification in a larger prospective trial.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPsychological DistressDepressionHumansNutritional StatusPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesStress, PsychologicalChemotherapyHead and neck cancerNutritionPsychological statusRadiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32025788
PMCPMC7072056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.