ArticleJAMIA open2019
Opportunities and challenges to advance the use of electronic patient-reported outcomes in clinical care: a report from AMIA workshop proceedings.
Article in JAMIA open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematic nurse-led consultations based on electronic patient-reported outcomes for women with endometrial or ovarian cancer during chemotherapy-a feasibility study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025Article
- Expert consensus on implementing patient-reported outcomes in telehealth: findings from an international Delphi study.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2025Article
- Improving the Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measure in Clinical Practice: Tackling Current Challenges With Innovative Digital Communication Technologies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Real-world use and clinical impact of an electronic patient-reported outcome tool in patients with solid tumors treated with immuno-oncology therapy.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2024Observational
- Implementing an Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome and Decision Support Tool in Early Intervention.Applied clinical informatics · 2023Article
- Electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) application for patients with prostate cancer.PloS one · 2023Article
- Association of Function, Symptoms, and Social Support Reported in Standardized Outpatient Clinic Questionnaires With Subsequent Hospital Discharge Disposition and 30-Day Readmissions.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Managing Critical Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Oncology Settings: System Development and Retrospective Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Adoption of Patient-Reported Outcomes by Health Systems and Physician Practices in the USA.Journal of general internal medicine · 2022Article
- The technical landscape for patient-centered CDS: progress, gaps, and challenges.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022Article
- Making the Case for Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Big-Data Rehabilitation Research: Implications for Optimizing Patient-Centered Care.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcome Assessment in Cancer Rehabilitation and the Central Role of Patient-Reported Outcomes.Cancers · 2021Review
- Lessons learned about virtual cancer care and distress screening in the time of COVID-19.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- A learning health systems approach to integrating electronic patient-reported outcomes across the health care organization.Learning health systems · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the demonstrated value of patient-centered care, health systems have been slow to integrate the patient's voice into care delivery through patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with electronic tools. This is due in part to the complex interplay of technology, workflow, and human factors that shape the success of electronic PROs (ePROs) use. The 2018 American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium served as the setting for a half-day interactive workshop with diverse stakeholders to discuss proposed best practices for the planning, design, deployment, and evaluation of ePROs. We provide this collective commentary that synthesizes participant feedback regarding critical challenges that prohibit the scale and spread of ePROs across healthcare delivery systems, including governance and leadership, workflow and human factors, informatics, and data science. In order to realize the promise of ePROs at scale, adaptable approaches are critical to balance the needs of individual users with health systems at large.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.