Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025631›Full record

ArticleGates open research2019

Planning and communicating prototype tests for the Nano Membrane Toilet: A critical review and proposed strategy.

Jan Hennigs, Alison Parker, Matt Collins, Ying Jiang, Athanasios Kolios, Ewan McAdam, Leon Williams, Sean Tyrrel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gates open research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jan HennigsWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5646-825X
Alison ParkerWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.
Matt CollinsWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.
Ying JiangWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7179-6347
Athanasios KoliosWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6711-641X
Ewan McAdamWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8982-0608
Leon WilliamsWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.
Sean TyrrelWater Science Institute, Cranfield University, Cranfield, MK430AL, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban sanitation in growing cities of the Global South presents particular challenges. This led to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Reinvent The Toilet Challenge, which sparked the development of various non-sewered sanitation technologies like the Nano Membrane Toilet. Complex disruptive technologies like this entail an extensive product development process, including various types of prototype tests. While there is an abundance of literature discussing how to build prototypes, and the optimal number of tests, there has been little focus on how to plan and conduct tests, especially in a development endeavour of this complexity. Four approaches to testing are reviewed, and their strengths and weaknesses compared. A visualised testing strategy is proposed that encompasses the entire product development process and can be used to plan and communicate prototype tests for the Nano Membrane Toilet to ultimately achieve compliance with international standards.

Indexed as

prototypingreinvent the toilettestingwaterless sanitation

Identifiers

PMID32025631
PMCPMC6974809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.