Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025583›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Development and validation of the Maternal Distraction Questionnaire.

Alison K Ventura, Megan Hupp, Shawnee Alvarez Gutierrez, Rebeca Almeida

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05285761 (ECR Visant à évaluer l'Effet d'Une Intervention Sur la Diffusion d'Informations), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05285761 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

ECR Visant à évaluer l'Effet d'Une Intervention Sur la Diffusion d'Informations (Conduite de la Diversification Alimentaire) Sur le Comportement de Nourrissage Des Parents, le Comportement Alimentaire et le Statut pondéral de l'Enfant

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'EnvironnementRan2022 to 2027Enrolled330ConditionsHealthy VolunteersArmsProvision of extended information on the conduct of complementary feeding, Provision of current official information on complementary feeding
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alison K VenturaCalifornia Polytechnic State University, Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, One Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
Megan HuppCalifornia Polytechnic State University, Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, One Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
Shawnee Alvarez GutierrezCalifornia Polytechnic State University, Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, One Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.
Rebeca AlmeidaCalifornia Polytechnic State University, Department of Kinesiology and Public Health, Center for Health Research, One Grand Ave, San Luis Obispo, CA, 93407, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper describes the development of a self-report measure of mothers' engagement in technological activities during mother-infant interactions. In Study 1, mothers (

Indexed as

Digital technology useMaternal distractionMother-infant interactionsPsychology

Identifiers

PMID32025583
PMCPMC6997568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.