ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2020
The Clinical Burden of
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and economic burden ofCMAJ openArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo understand the clinical burden of
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis using individual-level data from Ontario databases (April 1, 2005 to March 31, 2015), identifying CDI cases ≥18 years requiring hospitalization, and stratifying into cohorts based on association and onset location. Cohort members were matched to controls on demographics and medical conditions at onset, for outcomes including 30- and 180-day all-cause mortality and rehospitalization.
resultsWe stratified 22 617 individuals hospitalized with CDI during the study period: 13 152 (58.1%) ACH-associated/ACH-onset, 7116 (31.5%) community-associated/community-onset, 1847 (8.2%) ACH-associated/community-onset, and 502 (2.2%) LTCF-associated/LTCF-onset. Compared with controls, unadjusted 30-day rehospitalization rates were significantly higher (
conclusions
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.