Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025408›Full record

ArticleCureus2019

Features and Diagnostic Accuracy of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration.

Maria Usman, Kashif Iqbal, Muhammad Hassaan Ali, Khurram Nafees

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of active choroidal neovascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. OCTA: Essential or Gimmick?Ophthalmology and therapy · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria UsmanDivision of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Layton Rehmatulla Benevolent Trust (LRBT) Free Eye Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Kashif IqbalOphthalmology: Vitreo-retina, Layton Rehmatulla Benevolent Trust (LRBT) Free Eye Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Muhammad Hassaan AliOphthalmology, Allama Iqbal Medical College/Jinnah Hospital, Lahore, PAK.
Khurram NafeesOphthalmology, FMH College of Medicine and Dentistry, Lahore, PAK.
CMH Lahore Medical College and Institute of Dentistry · PKAllama Iqbal Medical College · PKMayo Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is one of the important causes of visual impairment in aging population. Fundus fluorescein angiography (FFA) is gold standard for the diagnosis of neovascular AMD (nAMD) while optical coherence tomography (OCT) aids in the diagnosis of nAMD and is very useful for follow-up. OCT angiography (OCTA) is an evolving imaging technology that can be used as a valid diagnostic tool to study morphology of choroidal neovascularization (CNV) that is seen in nAMD. This study was conducted with the objective to determine diagnostic accuracy and OCTA features of occult and classic CNV in patients with nAMD. Methods In this prospective observational study, 90 eyes of 58 patients with nAMD were studied with OCT, OCTA and FFA. OCTA scans were analyzed to qualitatively describe the morphological appearance of CNV in terms of location, pattern and configuration. The OCTA sensitivity and specificity for CNV detection were calculated by comparing it with FFA. Results FFA detected CNV in 70 of the 90 eyes (77.77%) whereas OCTA identified CNV in 69 eyes (76.7%). Among 69 eyes with CNV, it was well-defined in 51 (73.9%) eyes and poorly defined in 18 (26.1%) eyes. There were four false positive and five false negative cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of OCTA in detection of nAMD were found to be 92.85%, 80.0%, 94.2 and 76.2, respectively. Conclusion OCTA is a useful, noninvasive, reproducible imaging tool for diagnosing, classifying and localizing CNV. The technique has high sensitivity and specificity and can be used reliably in cases where FFA is contraindicated or inconclusive.

Indexed as

choroidal neovascularizationfundus fluorescein angiographyneovascular age related macular degenerationoptical coherence tomography angiography

Identifiers

PMID32025408
PMCPMC6984172
OpenAlexW2997490167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.