Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025365›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2020

The Global Museum: natural history collections and the future of evolutionary science and public education.

Freek T Bakker, Alexandre Antonelli, Julia A Clarke, Joseph A Cook, Scott V Edwards, Per G P Ericson, Søren Faurby, Nuno Ferrand, Magnus Gelang, Rosemary G Gillespie and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Global natural history infrastructure requires international solidarity, support, and investment in local capacity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  14. Life-History Traits ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Freek T BakkerBiosystematics Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Alexandre AntonelliDepartment of Science, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, United Kingdom.
Julia A ClarkeJackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, United States of America.
Joseph A CookMuseum of Southwestern Biology, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States of America.
Scott V EdwardsDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, United States of America.
Per G P EricsonDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Søren FaurbyDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Nuno FerrandMuseu de História Natural e da Ciência, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Magnus GelangDepartment of Zoology, Gothenburg Natural History Museum, Göteborg, Sweden.
Rosemary G GillespieEssig Museum of Entomology, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Martin IrestedtDepartment of Bioinformatics and Genetics, Swedish Museum of Natural History, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kennet LundinDepartment of Zoology, Gothenburg Natural History Museum, Göteborg, Sweden.
Ellen LarssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Pável Matos-MaravíBiology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Entomology, České Budějovice, Czechia.
Johannes MüllerLeibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany.
Ted von ProschwitzDepartment of Zoology, Gothenburg Natural History Museum, Göteborg, Sweden.
George K RoderickEssig Museum of Entomology, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States of America.
Alexander SchliepDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Niklas WahlbergDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
John WiedenhoeftDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Mari KällersjöGothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural history museums are unique spaces for interdisciplinary research and educational innovation. Through extensive exhibits and public programming and by hosting rich communities of amateurs, students, and researchers at all stages of their careers, they can provide a place-based window to focus on integration of science and discovery, as well as a locus for community engagement. At the same time, like a synthesis radio telescope, when joined together through emerging digital resources, the global community of museums (the 'Global Museum') is more than the sum of its parts, allowing insights and answers to diverse biological, environmental, and societal questions at the global scale, across eons of time, and spanning vast diversity across the Tree of Life. We argue that, whereas natural history collections and museums began with a focus on describing the diversity and peculiarities of species on Earth, they are now increasingly leveraged in new ways that significantly expand their impact and relevance. These new directions include the possibility to ask new, often interdisciplinary questions in basic and applied science, such as in biomimetic design, and by contributing to solutions to climate change, global health and food security challenges. As institutions, they have long been incubators for cutting-edge research in biology while simultaneously providing core infrastructure for research on present and future societal needs. Here we explore how the intersection between pressing issues in environmental and human health and rapid technological innovation have reinforced the relevance of museum collections. We do this by providing examples as food for thought for both the broader academic community and museum scientists on the evolving role of museums. We also identify challenges to the realization of the full potential of natural history collections and the Global Museum to science and society and discuss the critical need to grow these collections. We then focus on mapping and modelling of museum data (including place-based approaches and discovery), and explore the main projects, platforms and databases enabling this growth. Finally, we aim to improve relevant protocols for the long-term storage of specimens and tissues, ensuring proper connection with tomorrow's technologies and hence further increasing the relevance of natural history museums.

Indexed as

CollectionsEpigenomicsField educationGlobal museumInnovation-incubatorNatural historyPlace-basedSpecimensTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID32025365
PMCPMC6993751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.