Time Has Come for Routine Penicillin Allergy Testing in Obstetrics.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Obstetrics and gynecology care as an opportunity for penicillin allergy testing: Results from a novel survey.Dialogues in health · 2026
   Article
2. Penicillin allergy testing in pregnancy improves maternal and neonatal clinical outcomes.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
   Article
3. Clinical Impact and Management of Antibiotic Allergy in Pregnancy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
   Review
4. Management of the Pregnant Patient with Beta-Lactam Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023
   Review
5. Drug Allergy Delabeling Programs: Recent Strategies and Targeted Populations.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2022
   Review
6. Differences in beta-lactam and penicillin allergy: Beyond the West and focusing on Asia-Pacific.Frontiers in allergy · 2022
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as