Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025325›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology practice2020

Do we really know who has an

Annika Malmström, Małgorzata Łysiak, Bjarne Winther Kristensen, Elizabeth Hovey, Roger Henriksson, Peter Söderkvist

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Profiling in Neuro-Oncology: Where We Are, Where We're Heading, and How We Ensure Everyone Can Come Along.American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting · 2023
    Article
  13. The predictive value of partialNeuro-oncology practice · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. A Comparison ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Annika MalmströmDepartment of Advanced Home Care, Linköping University, Sweden.
Małgorzata ŁysiakDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Linköping University, Sweden.
Bjarne Winther KristensenDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark.
Elizabeth HoveyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Roger HenrikssonDepartment of Radiation Sciences, University of Umeå, Sweden.
Peter SöderkvistDepartment of Advanced Home Care, Linköping University, Sweden.
Linköping University · SEUmeå University · SEUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioma O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (

methodsWe conducted an international survey to clarify which methods are regularly used and why. We also explored opinions regarding international consensus on methods and cutoff.

resultsThe survey had 152 respondents from 25 countries.

conclusionAlthough analysis of

Indexed as

gliomainternational consensus guidelinesinternational surveylaboratory methods and cutoff levelMGMT testing

Identifiers

PMID32025325
PMCPMC6993038
OpenAlexW2976395281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.