ReviewRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2020
Vector competence of
Review in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular detection of human-derived Jingmenvirus in multiple mosquito species from Yaoundé, Cameroon.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- A new potential mosquito-borne virus: detection of Human-derived Jingmenvirus in several-species of mosquitoes from Yaoundé, Cameroon.Research square · 2025Article
- CRISPR/Cas Technology in Insect Insecticide Resistance.Insects · 2025Review
- Interepidemic xenosurveillance of Japanese encephalitis virus and Zika virus inVeterinary world · 2024Article
- The Susceptibility of Chickens to Zika Virus: A Comprehensive Study on Age-Dependent Infection Dynamics and Host Responses.Viruses · 2024Article
- Article
- Zika vector competence data reveals risks of outbreaks: the contribution of the European ZIKAlliance project.Nature communications · 2022Article
- SARS CoV-2: Progression and treatment protocols - An overview.Materials today. Proceedings · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo identify studies on the competence of
methodsWe performed an integrative review to identify relevant articles on specific experiments to determine whether
resultsWe identified 344 studies, of which 36 were considered for this review. In 8 studies, infection in salivary glands of
conclusionsThere is still a lack of compelling evidence that indicates
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.