Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025186›Full record

ArticleBiodiversity data journal2020

Rapid Least Concern: towards automating Red List assessments.

Steven Bachman, Barnaby Eliot Walker, Sara Barrios, Alison Copeland, Justin Moat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Globally aggregated biodiversity data impact predictive and descriptive research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Evidence-based guidelines for automated conservation assessments of plant species.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Steven BachmanRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1085-6075
Barnaby Eliot WalkerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3884-671X
Sara BarriosRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6541-1295
Alison CopelandDepartment of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of Bermuda, Hamilton, Bermuda Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Government of Bermuda Hamilton Bermuda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8549-5054
Justin MoatRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, United Kingdom Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew London United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe IUCN Red List of Threatened Species NEW INFORMATION: We present a web application,

Indexed as

automationBermudaGBIFLeast ConcernNon-threatenedplantsPlants of the World OnlineRed List

Identifiers

PMID32025186
PMCPMC6992691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.