Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32025003›Full record

ArticleNature genetics2020

Comprehensive analysis of chromothripsis in 2,658 human cancers using whole-genome sequencing.

Isidro Cortés-Ciriano, Jake June-Koo Lee, Ruibin Xi, Dhawal Jain, Youngsook L Jung, Lixing Yang, Dmitry Gordenin, Leszek J Klimczak, Cheng-Zhong Zhang, David S Pellman and 3 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 453 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
453citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
88.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

453 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 750 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

393 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

Isidro Cortés-CirianoDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2036-494X
Jake June-Koo LeeDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1348-4094
Ruibin XiSchool of Mathematical Sciences and Center for Statistical Science, Peking University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7545-7361
Dhawal JainDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Youngsook L JungDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Lixing YangBen May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Dmitry GordeninGenome Integrity and Structural Biology Laboratory, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, US National Institutes of Health, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8399-1836
Leszek J KlimczakIntegrative Bioinformatics Group, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, US National Institutes of Health, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3048-2576
Cheng-Zhong ZhangBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8825-7158
David S PellmanDepartment of Pediatric Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.
PCAWG Structural Variation Working Group
Peter J ParkDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. peter_park@hms.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9378-960X
PCAWG Consortium
Broad Institute · USUniversity of Cambridge · GBGerman Cancer Research Center · DEDana-Farber Cancer Institute · USCornell University · USUniversidade de Santiago de Compostela · ESHarvard University · USHeidelberg University · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKThe University of Melbourne · AUUniversity of Chicago · USBoston Children's Hospital · USRigshospitalet · DKThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBarcelona Supercomputing Center · ESNational Institutes of Health · USCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DESeoul National University Hospital · KRWashington State University · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Genome-wide hypermutation and structural instabilityZIAES103266 · NIEHS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GORDENIN, DMITRY · 2015 to 2025
$18.0M
DNA Damage Response and Repair of a Broken ChromosomeR35GM127029 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI JAMES E HABER · 2018 to 2026
$8.6M
ANALYSIS OF BRCA1 RECOMBINATION FUNCTIONSR01CA095175 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCULLY, RALPH · 2002 to 2021
$4.9M
Polyploidy, Aneuploidy and Genome StabilityR01CA213404 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PELLMAN, DAVID S · 2017 to 2024
$3.5M
FANCM in repair of stalled replication forksR01CA217991 · NCI · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCULLY, RALPH · 2017 to 2021
$2.0M
Structural variations and their impact in human cancerK22CA193848 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI YANG, LIXING · 2017 to 2019
$508k
Cancer Research UK 23924NCI NIH HHS K22 CA193848NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS R01 CA095175NCI NIH HHS R01 CA213404NCI NIH HHS R01 CA217991NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM127029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromothripsis is a mutational phenomenon characterized by massive, clustered genomic rearrangements that occurs in cancer and other diseases. Recent studies in selected cancer types have suggested that chromothripsis may be more common than initially inferred from low-resolution copy-number data. Here, as part of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), we analyze patterns of chromothripsis across 2,658 tumors from 38 cancer types using whole-genome sequencing data. We find that chromothripsis events are pervasive across cancers, with a frequency of more than 50% in several cancer types. Whereas canonical chromothripsis profiles display oscillations between two copy-number states, a considerable fraction of events involve multiple chromosomes and additional structural alterations. In addition to non-homologous end joining, we detect signatures of replication-associated processes and templated insertions. Chromothripsis contributes to oncogene amplification and to inactivation of genes such as mismatch-repair-related genes. These findings show that chromothripsis is a major process that drives genome evolution in human cancer.

Indexed as

ChromothripsisGenomicsWhole Genome SequencingEvolution, MolecularGenome, HumanHumansMutationNeoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32025003
PMCPMC7058534
OpenAlexW3005469082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.