Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024963›Full record

ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2020

Noninvasive prenatal diagnosis by genome-wide haplotyping of cell-free plasma DNA.

Huiwen Che, Darine Villela, Eftychia Dimitriadou, Cindy Melotte, Nathalie Brison, Maria Neofytou, Kris Van Den Bogaert, Olga Tsuiko, Koen Devriendt, Eric Legius and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Liquid Biopsy, a Potential New Detection Method in Heart Allograft Rejection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Expanded knowledge of cell-free DNA biology: potential to broaden the clinical utility.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2022
    Review
  16. Liquid biopsy: state of reproductive medicine and beyond.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2021
    Review
  17. Understanding False Negative in Prenatal Testing.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Huiwen CheCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Darine VillelaCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eftychia DimitriadouCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Cindy MelotteCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nathalie BrisonCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Maria NeofytouCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kris Van Den BogaertCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Olga TsuikoCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Koen DevriendtCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Eric LegiusCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Masoud Zamani EstekiCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Thierry VoetCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Joris Robert VermeeschCenter for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. joris.vermeesch@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3071-1191
KU Leuven · BECenter for Human Genetics · USMaastricht University · NLUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

CSRD VA 1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhereas noninvasive prenatal screening for aneuploidies is widely implemented, there is an increasing need for universal approaches for noninvasive prenatal screening for monogenic diseases. Here, we present a cost-effective, generic cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) haplotyping approach to scan the fetal genome for the presence of inherited monogenic diseases.

methodsFamilies participating in the preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) program were recruited for this study. Two hundred fifty thousand single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) captured from maternal plasma DNA along with genomic DNA from family members were massively parallel sequenced. Parental genotypes were phased via an available genotype from a close relative, and the fetal genome-wide haplotype and copy number were determined using cffDNA haplotyping analysis based on estimation and segmentation of fetal allele presence in the maternal plasma.

resultsIn all families tested, mutational profiles from cffDNA haplotyping are consistent with embryo biopsy profiles. Genome-wide fetal haplotypes are on average 97% concordant with the newborn haplotypes and embryo haplotypes.

conclusionWe demonstrate that genome-wide targeted capture and sequencing of polymorphic SNPs from maternal plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) allows haplotyping and copy-number profiling of the fetal genome during pregnancy. The method enables the accurate reconstruction of the fetal haplotypes and can be easily implemented in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsNoninvasive Prenatal TestingDNAFemaleHaplotypesHumansInfant, NewbornPlasmaPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNAcfDNAgenome-wide haplotypingNIPDNIPSnoninvasive prenatal testing

Identifiers

PMID32024963
OpenAlexW3005395257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.