Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024950›Full record

Trial reportLeukemia2020

Daratumumab monotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase 2 study (CENTAURUS).

C Ola Landgren, Ajai Chari, Yael C Cohen, Andrew Spencer, Peter Voorhees, Jane A Estell, Irwindeep Sandhu, Matthew W Jenner, Catherine Williams, Michele Cavo and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Leukemia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Genomics Define Malignant Transformation in Myeloma Precursor Conditions.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 16 institutions in 10 countries.

C Ola LandgrenDepartment of Medicine, Myeloma Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. landgrec@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6485-4839
Ajai ChariIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Yael C CohenDepartment of Hematology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky (Ichilov) Medical Center, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9061-7287
Andrew SpencerMalignant Haematology and Stem Cell Transplantation Service, Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Peter VoorheesLevine Cancer Institute/Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Jane A EstellHaematology Department, Concord Cancer Centre, Concord Hospital, University of Sydney, Concord, NSW, Australia.
Irwindeep SandhuDepartment of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Matthew W JennerSouthampton General Hospital, Southampton, UK.
Catherine WilliamsDepartment of Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottinghamshire, UK.
Michele CavoDepartment of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, "Seràgnoli" Institute of Hematology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Niels W C J van de DonkDepartment of Hematology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Meral BeksacDepartment of Hematology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey.
Philippe MoreauUniversity Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France.
Hartmut GoldschmidtUniversity Hospital Heidelberg and National Center of Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
Steven KuppensJanssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium.
Rajesh BandekarJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Pamela L ClemensJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Tobias NeffJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Christoph HeuckJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Ming QiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Craig C HofmeisterDepartment of Hematology & Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA. Craig.Hofmeister@emory.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4816-1607
Janssen (United States) · USAlfred Health · AUAmsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLAnkara University · TREmory University · USHeidelberg University · DEIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USJanssen (Belgium) · BELevine Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GBTel Aviv University · ILThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Alberta · CAUniversity of Bologna · IT

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Winship Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support GrantP30CA138292 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Suresh S Ramalingam · 2009 to 2026
$47.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA138292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current guidelines for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) recommend active monitoring until the onset of multiple myeloma (MM) before initiating treatment or enrollment in a clinical trial. Earlier intervention may delay progression to MM. In CENTAURUS, 123 patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk SMM were randomly assigned to daratumumab 16 mg/kg intravenously on extended intense (intense), extended intermediate (intermediate), or short dosing schedules. At the prespecified primary analysis (15.8-month median follow-up), the complete response (CR) rates (co-primary endpoint) were 2.4%, 4.9%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively; the co-primary endpoint of CR rate >15% was not met. Progressive disease (PD)/death rates (number of patients who progressed or died divided by total duration of progression-free survival [PFS] in patient-years; co-primary endpoint) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.055 (80% confidence interval [CI], 0.014-0.096), 0.102 (80% CI, 0.044-0.160), and 0.206 (80% CI, 0.118-0.295), respectively, translating to a median PFS ≥24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001, <0.0001, and =0.0213, respectively). With longer follow-up (median follow-up, 25.9 months), CR rates were 4.9%, 9.8%, and 0% for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. PD/death rates for intense, intermediate, and short dosing were 0.059 (80% CI, 0.025-0.092), 0.107 (80% CI, 0.058-0.155), and 0.150 (80% CI, 0.089-0.211), respectively, again translating to a median PFS ≥ 24 months in all arms (P < 0.0001 for all arms). Twenty-four-month PFS rates were 89.9% (90% CI, 78.5-95.4%), 82.0% (90% CI, 69.0-89.9%), and 75.3% (90% CI, 61.1-85.0%) for intense, intermediate, and short dosing, respectively. Pharmacokinetic analyses indicated that intense dosing maintained target-saturating trough concentrations in most patients throughout weekly, every-2-week, and every-4-week dosing periods. No new safety signals were observed. These data provide the basis for an ongoing phase 3 study of daratumumab in SMM.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSmoldering Multiple MyelomaSurvival RateAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agentsdaratumumab

Identifiers

PMID32024950
PMCPMC7326703
OpenAlexW3005289851

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.