Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024884›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Structure guided prediction of Pyrazinamide resistance mutations in pncA.

Malancha Karmakar, Carlos H M Rodrigues, Kristy Horan, Justin T Denholm, David B Ascher

Open access · goldAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Predicting rifampicin resistance inERJ open research · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Enhancing diagnostic efficiency of pyrazinamide resistance inCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025
    Article
  9. Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A simplified pyrazinamidase test forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Engineering G protein-coupled receptors for stabilization.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Prediction of pyrazinamide resistance inJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. AI-Driven Enhancements in Drug Screening and Optimization.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Malancha KarmakarComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Carlos H M RodriguesComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4420-6401
Kristy HoranMicrobiological Diagnostic Unit Public Health Laboratory, University of Melbourne at The Peter Doherty Institute for Infection &Immunity, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Justin T DenholmVictorian Tuberculosis Program, Melbourne Health and Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
David B AscherComputational Biology and Clinical Informatics, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. david.ascher@unimelb.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2948-2413
Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute · AUThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M026302/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pyrazinamide plays an important role in tuberculosis treatment; however, its use is complicated by side-effects and challenges with reliable drug susceptibility testing. Resistance to pyrazinamide is largely driven by mutations in pyrazinamidase (pncA), responsible for drug activation, but genetic heterogeneity has hindered development of a molecular diagnostic test. We proposed to use information on how variants were likely to affect the 3D structure of pncA to identify variants likely to lead to pyrazinamide resistance. We curated 610 pncA mutations with high confidence experimental and clinical information on pyrazinamide susceptibility. The molecular consequences of each mutation on protein stability, conformation, and interactions were computationally assessed using our comprehensive suite of graph-based signature methods, mCSM. The molecular consequences of the variants were used to train a classifier with an accuracy of 80%. Our model was tested against internationally curated clinical datasets, achieving up to 85% accuracy. Screening of 600 Victorian clinical isolates identified a set of previously unreported variants, which our model had a 71% agreement with drug susceptibility testing. Here, we have shown the 3D structure of pncA can be used to accurately identify pyrazinamide resistance mutations. SUSPECT-PZA is freely available at: http://biosig.unimelb.edu.au/suspect_pza/.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticAmidohydrolasesAmino Acid SubstitutionAntitubercular AgentsDatasets as TopicDNA, BacterialDNA Mutational AnalysisDrug Resistance, BacterialHumansMachine LearningMicrobial Sensitivity TestsModels, MolecularMutationMycobacterium tuberculosisProtein Structure, TertiaryPyrazinamideAmidohydrolasesAntitubercular AgentsDNA, BacterialPncA protein, Mycobacterium tuberculosisPyrazinamide

Identifiers

PMID32024884
PMCPMC7002382
OpenAlexW3004759689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.