Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024793›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Protocol for the process and feasibility evaluations of a new model of primary care service delivery for managing pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) using a mixed methods approach.

Jocelyn L Bowden, Thorlene Egerton, Rana S Hinman, Kim L Bennell, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Jessica Kasza, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta, Deborah J Schofield and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Jocelyn L BowdenInstitute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia jocelyn.bowden@sydney.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-0340-0232
Thorlene EgertonCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Rana S HinmanCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kim L BennellCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew M BriggsSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6736-3098
Stephen J BunkerMedibank, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica KaszaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Simon D FrenchDepartment of Chiropractic, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Marie PirottaDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Deborah J SchofieldCentre for Economic Impacts of Genomic Medicine, Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Nicholas A ZwarSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
David J HunterInstitute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, The University of Sydney, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3197-752X
The University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUAustralian Regenerative Medicine Institute · AUBond University · AUCurtin University · AUImpact · CAMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis protocol outlines the rationale, design and methods for the process and feasibility evaluations of the primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis (PARTNER) study. PARTNER is a randomised controlled trial to evaluate a new model of service delivery (the PARTNER model) against 'usual care'. PARTNER is designed to encourage greater uptake of key evidence-based non-surgical treatments for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in primary care. The intervention supports general practitioners (GPs) to gain an understanding of the best management options available through online professional development. Their patients receive telephone advice and support for OA management by a centralised, multidisciplinary 'Care Support Team'. We will conduct concurrent process and feasibility evaluations to understand the implementation of this new complex health intervention, identify issues for consideration when interpreting the effectiveness outcomes and develop recommendations for future implementation, cost effectiveness and scalability. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The UK Medical Research Council Framework for undertaking a process evaluation of complex interventions and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) frameworks inform the design of these evaluations. We use a mixed-methods approach including analysis of survey data, administrative records, consultation records and semistructured interviews with GPs and their enrolled patients. The analysis will examine fidelity and dose of the intervention, observations of trial setup and implementation and the quality of the care provided. We will also examine details of 'usual care'. The semistructured interviews will be analysed using thematic and content analysis to draw out themes around implementation and acceptability of the model. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The primary and substudy protocols have been approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of The University of Sydney (2016/959 and 2019/503). Our findings will be disseminated to national and international partners and stakeholders, who will also assist with wider dissemination of our results across all levels of healthcare. Specific findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and conferences, and via training for healthcare professionals delivering OA management programmes. This evaluation is crucial to explaining the PARTNER study results, and will be used to determine the feasibility of rolling-out the intervention in an Australian healthcare context. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12617001595303; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneePain ManagementPrimary Health CareAustraliaDelivery of Health CareFeasibility StudiesHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicclinical trialmodel of service deliveryprimary careprocess evaluationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID32024793
PMCPMC7045031
OpenAlexW3004733801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.