Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024786›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Menstrual health intervention and school attendance in Uganda (MENISCUS-2): a pilot intervention study.

Catherine Kansiime, Laura Hytti, Ruth Nalugya, Kevin Nakuya, Prossy Namirembe, Shamirah Nakalema, Stella Neema, Clare Tanton, Connie Alezuyo, Saidat Namuli Musoke and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04064736 (Menstrual Health Interventions and School Attendance Among Ugandans), which is not on this map. Cited by 53 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04064736 completednot on this map

Menstrual Health Interventions and School Attendance Among Ugandans

TypeobservationalSponsorLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical MedicineRan2017 to 2018Enrolled450ConditionsMenstrual Health Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Catherine KansiimeResearch Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda.
Laura HyttiWoMena Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Ruth NalugyaResearch Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda.
Kevin NakuyaResearch Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda.
Prossy NamirembeResearch Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda.
Shamirah NakalemaWoMena Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Stella NeemaCollege of Humanities and Social Science, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Clare TantonEpidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Connie AlezuyoPalm Tree Academy Uganda, Kampala, Uganda.
Saidat Namuli MusokeUganda Virus Research Institute, Entebbe, Uganda.
Belen TorondelFaculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Suzanna C FrancisMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David A RossDepartment of Maternal, Newborn, Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland.
Christopher BonellFaculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6253-6498
Janet SeeleyResearch Unit, Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Institute & London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine Uganda, Entebbe, Uganda.
Helen Anne WeissMRC Tropical Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK helen.weiss@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-3547-7936

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P020283/1Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1Wellcome TrustWorld Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAchieving good menstrual health and hygiene (MHH) is a public health challenge and there is little evidence to inform interventions. The aim of this study was to pilot test an intervention to improve MHH and school attendance in Uganda, in preparation for a future cluster-randomised trial.

designLongitudinal study with pre-post evaluation of a pilot intervention.

settingTwo secondary schools in Entebbe, Uganda.

participantsOf the 473 eligible students in secondary 2 (S2) at baseline, 450 (95.1%; 232 girls and 218 boys) consented/assented. 369 students (188 girls; 81.0%; and 181 boys; 83.0%) participated in the endline survey.

interventionThe intervention comprised training teachers to improve delivery of government guidelines for puberty education, training in use of a menstrual kit and pain management, a drama skit, provision of analgesics and improvements to school water and sanitation hygiene facilities. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility and acceptability of delivering the intervention. Baseline and endline quantitative surveys were conducted, with qualitative interviews conducted at endline. School attendance was assessed using self-completed daily diaries among a nested cohort of 100 female students.

resultsThere were high levels of uptake of the individual and behavioural intervention components (puberty education, drama skit, menstrual hygiene management (MHM) kit and pain management). The proportion of girls reporting anxiety about next period decreased from 58.6% to 34.4%, and reported use of effective pain management increased from 76.4% to 91.4%. Most girls (81.4%) reported improved school toilet facilities, which improved their comfort managing menstruation. The diary data and qualitative data indicated a potential intervention impact on improving menstrual-related school absenteeism.

conclusionsThe pilot study showed that the multicomponent MHM intervention was acceptable and feasible to deliver, and potentially effective in improving menstruation knowledge and management. A cluster-randomised trial is needed to evaluate rigorously the intervention effects on MHM and school attendance. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04064736; Pre-results.

Indexed as

AbsenteeismHealth EducationMenstruationPubertyAdolescentFemaleHumansHygieneLongitudinal StudiesMaleMenstrual Hygiene ProductsPain ManagementPilot ProjectsSchool Health ServicesSchoolsSelf-Managementadolescent healtheducationmenstrual healthmenstrual hygieneschool attendance

Identifiers

PMID32024786
PMCPMC7044877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.