Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024711›Full record

ArticlemSphere2020

Yang-Nim Park, Kayla Conway, Claude Pujol, Karla J Daniels, David R Soll

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSphere, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Response ofmSphere · 2026
    Article
  3. Genetic and environmental control of parasexual reproduction in the pathogenicMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. The rod cell, a small form ofActa biochimica et biophysica Sinica · 2024
    Article
  7. White-opaque switching inMicrobiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of changes at theCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Role of themBio · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. N-Acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) Sensing, Utilization, and Functions inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yang-Nim ParkDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Department of Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Kayla ConwayDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Department of Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Claude PujolDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Department of Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Karla J DanielsDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Department of Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
David R SollDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, Department of Biology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA david-soll@uiowa.edu.
University of Iowa · USDevelopmental Studies Hybridoma Bank · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcription factor

Indexed as

AnimalsCandida albicansDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleFungal ProteinsGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, FungalGlucoseMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutationPhenotypeTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsEFG1 protein, Candida albicansFungal ProteinsGlucoseTranscription FactorsCandida albicansclinical isolatesEFG1 mutationswitching to opaque

Identifiers

PMID32024711
PMCPMC7002308
OpenAlexW3005187587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.