Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024496›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2020

Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial: Qiliqiangxin in heart failUre: assESsment of reduction in morTality (QUEST).

Wenming Yao, Iokfai Cheang, Shengen Liao, Yanli Zhou, Fang Zhou, Dongjie Xu, Zhenhua Jia, Liping Chang, Haifeng Zhang, Xinli Li

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Current and Future of Heart Failure Care in Asia.International journal of heart failure · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Effects ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wenming YaoDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Iokfai CheangDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Shengen LiaoDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Yanli ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Fang ZhouDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Dongjie XuDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Zhenhua JiaNational Key Laboratory of Collateral Disease Research and Innovative Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China.
Liping ChangNational Key Laboratory of Collateral Disease Research and Innovative Chinese Medicine, Shijiazhuang, China.
Haifeng ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China.
Xinli LiDepartment of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Guangzhou Road 300, Nanjing, 210029, China. xinli3267@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6794-1468
Nanjing Medical University · CNHebei Yiling Hospital · CN

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1700501National Key R&D Program of China 2017YFC1700505the Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 81730106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQiliqiangxin (QLQX) capsule is a Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) that has been approved in China for the treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). Our previous study showed with a background of standard HF treatment, QLQX capsules further reduced the levels of NT-proBNP and the incidence of composite cardiac events (CCEs) in CHF patients. This study aims to further assess the reduction in mortality when using QLQX compared with placebo for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients.

methodsThis study is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center, event-driven clinical study of approximately 3080 patients for a targeted 620 events. Patients must have a diagnosis of heart failure for at least 3 months prior to screening. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive the placebo or QLQX in addition to their standard medications of CHF. The primary efficacy outcome event is a composite cardiovascular death and re-hospitalization due to the worsening of heart failure. DISCUSSION: The QUEST study is a randomized control study of TCM in chronic heart failure. It will determine the place of QLQX as an new treatment approach and provide additional and innovative information regarding TCM - and the specific used of QLQX in HFrEF.

trial registrationThe trial was registered at http://www.chictr.org.cn. ( Registration No.: ChiCTR1900021929); Date: 2019-03-16.

Indexed as

Drugs, Chinese HerbalHeart FailureAdultCapsulesDouble-Blind MethodHospitalizationHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicStroke VolumeCapsulesDrugs, Chinese HerbalqiliqiangxinHeart failureMortalityQiliqiangxin (QLQX)RationaleTraditional Chinese medicine (TCM)

Identifiers

PMID32024496
PMCPMC7076750
OpenAlexW3006248616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.