Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024470›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2020

Validation of the French version of the Vulnerable Elders Survey-13 (VES-13).

Joël Belmin, Lyamna Khellaf, Sylvie Pariel, Witold Jarzebowski, Lucie Valembois, John Zeisel, Carmelo Lafuente-Lafuente

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joël BelminService de gériatrie à orientation cardiovasculaire et neuropsychogériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ivry-sur-Seine, France. j.belmin@aphp.fr.ORCID 0000-0003-1630-9582
Lyamna KhellafService de gériatrie à orientation cardiovasculaire et neuropsychogériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Sylvie ParielService de Gériatrie Ambulatoire, Hôpital Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Witold JarzebowskiService de gériatrie à orientation cardiovasculaire et neuropsychogériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
Lucie ValemboisService de gériatrie à orientation cardiovasculaire et neuropsychogériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.
John ZeiselHearthstone Alzheimer Care, Woburn, MA, USA.
Carmelo Lafuente-LafuenteService de gériatrie à orientation cardiovasculaire et neuropsychogériatrique, Hôpital Charles Foix, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Ivry-sur-Seine, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying and assessing degree and type of frailty among older persons is a major challenge when targeting high risk populations to identify preventive interventions. The Vulnerable Elders Survey-(VES-13) is a simple instrument to identify frailty defined as risk for death, functional decline or institutionalization.

objectiveTranslate VES-13 into French and validate it.

methodsThe French version of VES-13 was developed by forward-backward translation of the VES-13 survey instrument. The authors assessed its feasibility, construct validity, and ability to predict the combined outcomes of admission to institution or death at 18 months, in 135 persons over 70 years of age living in the community. Subjects were recruited from three settings: Group 1 - a health prevention center (n = 45); Group 2 - an ambulatory care geriatric clinic (n = 40); and Group 3 - an intermediate care hospital unit (n = 50). The combined outcomes data were recorded by telephone interview with participants or a proxy.

resultsFeasibility of the French version, named Echelle de Vulnérabilité des Ainés-13 or EVA-13, was excellent. The scale classified 5 (11%) persons as vulnerable (score of 3 or more) in Group 1, 23 (58%) in Group 2 and 45 (90%) in Group 3 (p < 0.001) with scores of 0.91 +/- 1.16, 4.27 +/- 3.17 and 6.90 +/- 3.17, respectively (p < 0.001). At follow-up, among the 60 non-vulnerable subjects, 58 (96%) were alive and living at home, whereas 46 (65%) of the 70 vulnerable subjects were alive and living at home (p < 0.001).

conclusionsEVA-13 was determined to be valid and reliable.

Indexed as

Functional StatusTranslationsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFrail ElderlyGeriatric AssessmentHumansMaleRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesVulnerable PopulationsEVA-13FrailtyFrench versionFunctional declineMortalityVES-13VulnerabilityVulnerable elders survey-13

Identifiers

PMID32024470
PMCPMC7003319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.