Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024233›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Characterization and Identification of Natural Antimicrobial Peptides on Different Organisms.

Chia-Ru Chung, Jhih-Hua Jhong, Zhuo Wang, Siyu Chen, Yu Wan, Jorng-Tzong Horng, Tzong-Yi Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Expression and Immune Response Profiles in Nile Tilapia (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Peptidome Profiling ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A review on antimicrobial peptides databases and the computational tools.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Chia-Ru ChungDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan.
Jhih-Hua JhongWarshel Institute for Computational Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Zhuo WangWarshel Institute for Computational Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Siyu ChenSchool of Life and Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Yu WanSchool of Life and Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Jorng-Tzong HorngDepartment of Computer Science and Information Engineering, National Central University, Taoyuan 32001, Taiwan.
Tzong-Yi LeeWarshel Institute for Computational Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen · CNAsia University · TWNational Central University · TW

Funding

Warshel Institute for Computational Biology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen PF001072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because of the rapid development of multidrug resistance, conventional antibiotics cannot kill pathogenic bacteria efficiently. New antibiotic treatments such as antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) can provide a possible solution to the antibiotic-resistance crisis. However, the identification of AMPs using experimental methods is expensive and time-consuming. Meanwhile, few studies use amino acid compositions (AACs) and physicochemical properties with different sequence lengths against different organisms to predict AMPs. Therefore, the major purpose of this study is to identify AMPs on seven categories of organisms, including amphibians, humans, fish, insects, plants, bacteria, and mammals. According to the one-rule attribute evaluation, the selected features were used to construct the predictive models based on the random forest algorithm. Compared to the accuracies of iAMP-2L (a web-server for identifying AMPs and their functional types), ADAM (a database of AMP), and MLAMP (a multi-label AMP classifier), the proposed method yielded higher than 92% in predicting AMPs on each category. Additionally, the sensitivities of the proposed models in the prediction of AMPs of seven organisms were higher than that of all other tools. Furthermore, several physicochemical properties (charge, hydrophobicity, polarity, polarizability, secondary structure, normalized van der Waals volume, and solvent accessibility) of AMPs were investigated according to their sequence lengths. As a result, the proposed method is a practical means to complement the existing tools in the characterization and identification of AMPs in different organisms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug Resistance, BacterialAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic PeptidesBacteriaHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial Cationic Peptidesantimicrobial peptidesfeature selectionmachine learningorganismssequence analysis

Identifiers

PMID32024233
PMCPMC7038045
OpenAlexW3003306158

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.