Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32024062›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Individual Differences in Sweetness Ratings and Cross-Modal Aroma-Taste Interactions.

Anne Sjoerup Bertelsen, Line Ahm Mielby, Niki Alexi, Derek Victor Byrne, Ulla Kidmose

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anne Sjoerup BertelsenDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Line Ahm MielbyDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Niki AlexiDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Derek Victor ByrneDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Ulla KidmoseDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Technical Sciences, Aarhus University, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.

Funding

Innovationsfonden 6150-00037B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aroma-taste interactions, which are believed to occur due to previous coexposure (concurrent presence of aroma and taste), have been suggested as a strategy to aid sugar reduction in food and beverages. However, coexposures might be influenced by individual differences. We therefore hypothesized that aroma-taste interactions vary across individuals. The present study investigated how individual differences (gender, age, and sweet liker status) influenced the effect of aroma on sweetness intensity among young adults. An initial screening of five aromas, all congruent with sweet taste, for their sweetness enhancing effect was carried out using descriptive analysis. Among the aromas tested, vanilla was found most promising for its sweet enhancing effects and was therefore tested across three sucrose concentrations by 129 young adults. Among the subjects tested, females were found to be more susceptible to the sweetness enhancing effect of vanilla aroma than males. For males, the addition of vanilla aroma increased the sweet taste ratings significantly for the 22-25-year-olds, but not the 19-21-year-olds. Consumers were clustered according to their sweet liker status based on their liking for the samples. Although sweet taste ratings were found to vary with the sweet liker status, aroma enhanced the sweetness ratings similarly across clusters. These results call for more targeted product development in order to aid sugar reduction.

Indexed as

ageconsumersgendersugar reductionsweetsweet liker statusvanillayoung adults

Identifiers

PMID32024062
PMCPMC7074324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.