ArticleMicroorganisms2020
Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Use of Molecular Biology Methods to Evaluate the Activity of Different Topical Treatments Against Periodontal Pathogen Bacteria.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Translating microbial knowledge into clinical biofilm therapies.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Arginine combination with fluoride and calcium glycerophosphate: effects of concentration and on biofilm fluid.Future microbiology · 2025Article
- Formation, architecture, and persistence of oral biofilms: recent scientific discoveries and new strategies for their regulation.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Microbial Dynamics in Periodontal Regeneration: Understanding Microbiome Shifts and the Role of Antifouling and Bactericidal Materials: A Narrative Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024Review
- Development of a Coculture Model for Assessing Competing Host Mammalian Cell and Bacterial Attachment on Zirconia versus Titanium.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2024Article
- Evaluating the Effectiveness ofPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Tetracyclic homoisoflavanoid (+)-brazilin: a natural product inhibits c-di-AMP-producing enzyme andMicrobiology spectrum · 2024Article
- ProbioticJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Salivary levels of five microorganisms of root caries in nursing home elderly: a preliminary investigation.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- One-Pot Preparation of Cetylpyridinium Chloride-Containing Nanoparticles for Biofilm Eradication.ACS applied bio materials · 2023Article
- Article
- Article
- Phytochemical Profile of Antibacterial Agents from Red Betel Leaf (Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Distinctive microbiota distribution from healthy oral to post-treatment apical periodontitis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- How Do Polymer Coatings Affect the Growth and Bacterial Population of a Biofilm Formed by Total Human Salivary Bacteria?-A Study by 16S-RNA Sequencing.Microorganisms · 2021Article
- Metagenomic Analysis of Dental Plaque on Pit and Fissure Sites With and Without Caries Among Adolescents.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Susceptibility to biofilm formation on 3D-printed titanium fixation plates used in the mandible: a preliminary study.Journal of oral microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The study of bacterial interaction between Streptococcus mutans and Actinomyces naeslundii may disclose important features of biofilm interspecies relationships. The aim of this study was to characterize-with an emphasis on biofilm formation and composition and metabolic activity-single- and dual-species biofilms of S. mutans or A. naeslundii, and to use a drip flow reactor (DFR) to evaluate biofilm stress responses to 0.2% chlorhexidine diacetate (CHX). Single- and dual-species biofilms were grown for 24 h. The following factors were evaluated: cell viability, biomass and total proteins in the extracellular matrix, 2,3-bis(2-methoxy-4-nitro-5-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium-5-carboxanilide-"XTT"-reduction and lactic acid production. To evaluate stress response, biofilms were grown in DFR. Biofilms were treated with CHX or 0.9% sodium chloride (NaCl; control). Biofilms were plated for viability assessment. Confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) was also performed. Data analysis was carried out at 5% significance level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.