Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32023435›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2020

Classifying Drugs by their Arrhythmogenic Risk Using Machine Learning.

Francisco Sahli-Costabal, Kinya Seo, Euan Ashley, Ellen Kuhl

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Prediction of arrhythmia susceptibility through mathematical modeling and machine learning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Multiscale modeling meets machine learning: What can we learn?Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews · 2021
    Article
  11. CombinedFrontiers in physiology · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francisco Sahli-CostabalDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Kinya SeoDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Euan AshleyDepartment of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
Ellen KuhlDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California. Electronic address: ekuhl@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USStanford Medicine · US

Funding

Multi-Scale Laws of Myocardial Growth and RemodelingU01HL119578 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GUCCIONE, JULIUS MATTEO, KASSAB, GHASSAN S · 2014 to 2018
$3.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL119578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

All medications have adverse effects. Among the most serious of these are cardiac arrhythmias. Current paradigms for drug safety evaluation are costly, lengthy, conservative, and impede efficient drug development. Here, we combine multiscale experiment and simulation, high-performance computing, and machine learning to create a risk estimator to stratify new and existing drugs according to their proarrhythmic potential. We capitalize on recent developments in machine learning and integrate information across 10 orders of magnitude in space and time to provide a holistic picture of the effects of drugs, either individually or in combination with other drugs. We show, both experimentally and computationally, that drug-induced arrhythmias are dominated by the interplay between two currents with opposing effects: the rapid delayed rectifier potassium current and the L-type calcium current. Using Gaussian process classification, we create a classifier that stratifies drugs into safe and arrhythmic domains for any combinations of these two currents. We demonstrate that our classifier correctly identifies the risk categories of 22 common drugs exclusively on the basis of their concentrations at 50% current block. Our new risk assessment tool explains under which conditions blocking the L-type calcium current can delay or even entirely suppress arrhythmogenic events. Using machine learning in drug safety evaluation can provide a more accurate and comprehensive mechanistic assessment of the proarrhythmic potential of new drugs. Our study paves the way toward establishing science-based criteria to accelerate drug development, design safer drugs, and reduce heart rhythm disorders.

Indexed as

Arrhythmias, CardiacPharmaceutical PreparationsAction PotentialsComputer SimulationHumansMachine LearningRisk AssessmentPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID32023435
PMCPMC7063479
OpenAlexW3001188008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.