Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32023251›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

From Rags to Riches: Assessing poverty and vulnerability in urban Nepal.

Tim Ensor, Radheshyam Bhattarai, Shraddha Manandhar, Ak Narayan Poudel, Rajeev Dhungel, Sushil Baral, Joseph P Hicks, Dana Thomson, Helen Elsey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim EnsorNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0279-9576
Radheshyam BhattaraiHERD INTERNATIONAL, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Shraddha ManandharHelen Keller International, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Ak Narayan PoudelNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.
Rajeev DhungelWorld Vision International Nepal, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sushil BaralHERD INTERNATIONAL, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Joseph P HicksNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0303-6207
Dana ThomsonSocial Statistics, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9507-9123
Helen ElseyNuffield Centre for International Health and Development, University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom.
University of Leeds · GBHelen Keller International Nepal · NPUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P024718/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urbanisation brings with it rapid socio-economic change with volatile livelihoods and unstable ownership of assets. Yet, current measures of wealth are based predominantly on static livelihoods found in rural areas. We sought to assess the extent to which seven common measures of wealth appropriately capture vulnerability to poverty in urban areas. We then sought to develop a measure that captures the characteristics of one urban area in Nepal. We collected and analysed data from 1,180 households collected during a survey conducted between November 2017 and January 2018 and designed to be representative of the Kathmandu valley. A separate survey of a sub set of households was conducted using participatory qualitative methods in slum and non-slum neighbourhoods. A series of currently used indices of deprivation were calculated from questionnaire data. We used bivariate statistical methods to examine the association between each index and identify characteristics of poor and non-poor. Qualitative data was used to identify characteristics of poverty from the perspective of urban poor communities which were used to construct an Urban Poverty Index that combined asset and consumption focused context specific measures of poverty that could be proxied by easily measured indicators as assessed through multivariate modelling. We found a strong but not perfect association between each measure of poverty. There was disagreement when comparing the consumption and deprivation index on the classification of 19% of the sample. Choice of short-term monetary and longer-term capital approaches accounted for much of the difference. Those who reported migrating due to economic necessity were most likely to be categorised as poor. A combined index was developed to capture these dimension of poverty and understand urban vulnerability. A second version of the index was constructed that can be computed using a smaller range of variables to identify those in poverty. Current measures may hide important aspects of urban poverty. Those who migrate out of economic necessity are particularly vulnerable. A composite index of socioeconomic status helps to capture the complex nature of economic vulnerability.

Indexed as

Confidence IntervalsEmigrants and ImmigrantsFamily CharacteristicsHumansNepalPovertyUrban Population

Identifiers

PMID32023251
PMCPMC7001899
OpenAlexW3004447045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.