Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32023245›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Experimental and modeling study of the formation of cell aggregates with differential substrate adhesion.

Léo Adenis, Emilie Gontran, Christophe Deroulers, Basile Grammaticos, Marjorie Juchaux, Olivier Seksek, Mathilde Badoual

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Léo AdenisCNRS UMR 8165, Laboratoire IMNC, Univ Paris-Sud, Univ Paris Diderot, 91405 Orsay, France.
Emilie GontranICPH Interactions Cellulaires et Physiopathologie Hépatique, UMR S 1174 INSERM, Univ Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France.
Christophe DeroulersUniv Paris Diderot, Laboratoire IMNC, UMR 8165 CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France.
Basile GrammaticosCNRS UMR 8165, Laboratoire IMNC, Univ Paris-Sud, Univ Paris Diderot, 91405 Orsay, France.
Marjorie JuchauxCNRS UMR 8165, Laboratoire IMNC, Univ Paris-Sud, Univ Paris Diderot, 91405 Orsay, France.
Olivier SeksekCNRS UMR 8165, Laboratoire IMNC, Univ Paris-Sud, Univ Paris Diderot, 91405 Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3053-3022
Mathilde BadoualUniv Paris Diderot, Laboratoire IMNC, UMR 8165 CNRS, Univ Paris-Sud, 91405 Orsay, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4450-7343

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of cell aggregation in vitro has a tremendous importance these days. In cancer biology, aggregates and spheroids serve as model systems and are considered as pseudo-tumors that are more realistic than 2D cell cultures. Recently, in the context of brain tumors (gliomas), we developed a new poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG)-based hydrogel, with adhesive properties that can be controlled by the addition of poly(L-lysine) (PLL), and a stiffness close to the brain's. This substrate allows the motion of individual cells and the formation of cell aggregates (within one day), and we showed that on a non-adhesive substrate (PEG without PLL is inert for cells), the aggregates are bigger and less numerous than on an adhesive substrate (with PLL). In this article, we present new experimental results on the follow-up of the formation of aggregates on our hydrogels, from the early stages (individual cells) to the late stages (aggregate compaction), in order to compare, for two cell lines (F98 and U87), the aggregation process on the adhesive and non-adhesive substrates. We first show that a spaceless model of perikinetic aggregation can reproduce the experimental evolution of the number of aggregates, but not of the mean area of the aggregates. We thus develop a minimal off-lattice agent-based model, with a few simple rules reproducing the main processes that are at stack during aggregation. Our spatial model can reproduce very well the experimental temporal evolution of both the number of aggregates and their mean area, on adhesive and non-adhesive soft gels and for the two different cell lines. From the fit of the experimental data, we were able to infer the quantitative values of the speed of motion of each cell line, its rate of proliferation in aggregates and its ability to organize in 3D. We also found qualitative differences between the two cell lines regarding the ability of aggregates to compact. These parameters could be inferred for any cell line, and correlated with clinical properties such as aggressiveness and invasiveness.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCell AggregationModels, BiologicalCell Culture TechniquesCell LineCell ProliferationHumansHydrogelsKineticsPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysineHydrogelsPolyethylene GlycolsPolylysine

Identifiers

PMID32023245
PMCPMC7001941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.