ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Predicting colorectal cancer risk from adenoma detection via a two-type branching process model.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic performance of photon-counting detector CT versus energy-integrating detector CT for colorectal polyp detection: a phantom study.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Bayesian inference of fitness landscapes via tree-structured branching processes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Mathematical modeling the order of driver gene mutations in colorectal cancer.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Shape-specific characterization of colorectal adenoma growth and transition to cancer with stochastic cell-based models.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Mathematical modeling for mutator phenotype and clonal selection advantage in the risk analysis of lung cancer.Theory in biosciences = Theorie in den Biowissenschaften · 2022Article
- Modeling age-specific incidence of colon cancer via niche competition.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Longitudinal changes in personalized platelet count metrics are good indicators of initial 3-year outcome in colorectal cancer.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- Article
- Optimal Timing for Cancer Screening and Adaptive Surveillance Using Mathematical Modeling.Cancer research · 2021Article
- A mathematical model of ctDNA shedding predicts tumor detection size.Science advances · 2020Article
- Mathematical model of colorectal cancer initiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- Epidemiology of neoplastic colorectal polyps in a Caribbean country.Medicine internationalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in the modeling and understanding of colorectal cancer development, the dynamics of the progression from benign adenomatous polyp to colorectal carcinoma are still not fully resolved. To take advantage of adenoma size and prevalence data in the National Endoscopic Database of the Clinical Outcomes Research Initiative (CORI) as well as colorectal cancer incidence and size data from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, we construct a two-type branching process model with compartments representing adenoma and carcinoma cells. To perform parameter inference we present a new large-size approximation to the size distribution of the cancer compartment and validate our approach on simulated data. By fitting the model to the CORI and SEER data, we learn biologically relevant parameters, including the transition rate from adenoma to cancer. The inferred parameters allow us to predict the individualized risk of the presence of cancer cells for each screened patient. We provide a web application which allows the user to calculate these individual probabilities at https://ccrc-eth.shinyapps.io/CCRC/. For example, we find a 1 in 100 chance of cancer given the presence of an adenoma between 10 and 20mm size in an average risk patient at age 50. We show that our two-type branching process model recapitulates the early growth dynamics of colon adenomas and cancers and can recover epidemiological trends such as adenoma prevalence and cancer incidence while remaining mathematically and computationally tractable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.