Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32023222›Full record

ArticleAging2020

Protein disulfide isomerases are promising targets for predicting the survival and tumor progression in glioma patients.

Zhigang Peng, Yu Chen, Hui Cao, Hecun Zou, Xin Wan, Wenjing Zeng, Yanling Liu, Jiaqing Hu, Nan Zhang, Zhiwei Xia and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Thioredoxin Domain Containing 5 (TXNDC5): Friend or Foe?Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhigang PengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, Henan, P. R. China.
Hui CaoDepartment of Psychiatry, The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410007, Hunan, P. R. China.
Hecun ZouDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Xin WanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Wenjing ZengDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Yanling LiuDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Jiaqing HuDepartment of Emergency, The Second People's Hospital of Hunan Province, The Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha 410007, Hunan, P. R. China.
Nan ZhangSchool of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang, P. R. China.
Zhiwei XiaDepartment of Neurology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Zhixiong LiuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Quan ChengDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan, P. R. China.
Central South University · CNXiangya Hospital Central South University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNHarbin Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study focused on the expression patterns, prognostic values and potential mechanism of the PDI family in gliomas. Most PDI family members' mRNA expressions were observed significantly different between gliomas classified by clinical features. Construction of the PDI signature, cluster and risk score models of glioma was done using GSVA, consensus clustering analysis, and LASSO Cox regression analysis respectively. High values of PDI signature/ risk score and cluster 1 in gliomas were associated with malignant clinicopathological characteristics and poor prognosis. Analysis of the distinctive genomic alterations in gliomas revealed that many cases having high PDI signature and risk score were associated with genomic aberrations of driver oncogenes. GSVA analysis showed that PDI family was involved in many signaling pathways in ERAD, apoptosis, and MHC class I among many more. Prognostic nomogram revealed that the risk score was a good prognosis indicator for gliomas. The qRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry confirmed that P4HB, PDIA4 and PDIA5 were overexpressed in gliomas. In summary, this research highlighted the clinical importance of PDI family in tumorigenesis and progression in gliomas.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesRNA, MessengerTranscriptomeBiomarkers, TumorProtein Disulfide-IsomerasesRNA, MessengerGBMgliomaPDIPDI familyprognosis

Identifiers

PMID32023222
PMCPMC7041756
OpenAlexW3004997131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.