ReviewThe British journal of radiology2020
Positron emission tomography/MRI for cardiac diseases assessment.
Review in The British journal of radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Can multiparametric FDG-PET/MRI analysis really enhance the prediction of myocardial recovery after CTO revascularization? A machine learning study.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
- Case Report: Adjuvant radiation therapy for cardiac intimal sarcoma with long-term disease control.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Review
- Current status and perspectives of nuclear cardiology.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2024Review
- Anderson-Fabry disease cardiomyopathy: an update on epidemiology, diagnostic approach, management and monitoring strategies.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Nuclear Molecular Imaging of Disease Burden and Response to Treatment for Cardiac Amyloidosis.Biology · 2022Review
- Advances in Diagnostic Imaging for Cardiac Sarcoidosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Imaging patients with stable chest pain special feature: introductory editorial.The British journal of radiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional imaging tools have emerged in the last few decades and are increasingly used to assess the function of the human heart
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.