Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022884›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Treatment Pathways for Opioid Use Disorder.

Sarah E Wakeman, Marc R Larochelle, Omid Ameli, Christine E Chaisson, Jeffrey Thomas McPheeters, William H Crown, Francisca Azocar, Darshak M Sanghavi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 568 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
568citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
91.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

568 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 926 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

508 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah E WakemanDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.
Marc R LarochelleClinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Omid AmeliIntegrated Programs, OptumLabs Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Christine E ChaissonIntegrated Programs, OptumLabs Inc, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey Thomas McPheetersDepartment of Research, OptumLabs, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
William H CrownDepartment of Research, OptumLabs, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Francisca AzocarDepartment of Research, Optum Behavioral Health, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Darshak M SanghaviDepartment of Medicare and Retirement, United Healthcare, Minnetonka, Minnesota.
Optum (United States) · USBoston Medical Center · USHarvard University · USUnited Hospital · US

Funding

Improving urine drug test utility to mitigate prescription opioid riskK23DA042168 · NIDA · BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER · PI LAROCHELLE, MARC · 2017 to 2021
$956k
Heroin use and overdose following changes to individual-level opioid prescribingU01CE002780 · CE · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BOHNERT, AMY S B, LAROCHELLE, MARC · 2017 to 2018
$800k
FDA HHS HHSF223200910006INCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002780NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA042168
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although clinical trials demonstrate the superior effectiveness of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) compared with nonpharmacologic treatment, national data on the comparative effectiveness of real-world treatment pathways are lacking. Objective: To examine associations between opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment pathways and overdose and opioid-related acute care use as proxies for OUD recurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective comparative effectiveness research study assessed deidentified claims from the OptumLabs Data Warehouse from individuals aged 16 years or older with OUD and commercial or Medicare Advantage coverage. Opioid use disorder was identified based on 1 or more inpatient or 2 or more outpatient claims for OUD diagnosis codes within 3 months of each other; 1 or more claims for OUD plus diagnosis codes for opioid-related overdose, injection-related infection, or inpatient detoxification or residential services; or MOUD claims between January 1, 2015, and September 30, 2017. Data analysis was performed from April 1, 2018, to June 30, 2019. Exposures: One of 6 mutually exclusive treatment pathways, including (1) no treatment, (2) inpatient detoxification or residential services, (3) intensive behavioral health, (4) buprenorphine or methadone, (5) naltrexone, and (6) nonintensive behavioral health. Main Outcomes and Measures: Opioid-related overdose or serious acute care use during 3 and 12 months after initial treatment. Results: A total of 40 885 individuals with OUD (mean [SD] age, 47.73 [17.25] years; 22 172 [54.2%] male; 30 332 [74.2%] white) were identified. For OUD treatment, 24 258 (59.3%) received nonintensive behavioral health, 6455 (15.8%) received inpatient detoxification or residential services, 5123 (12.5%) received MOUD treatment with buprenorphine or methadone, 1970 (4.8%) received intensive behavioral health, and 963 (2.4%) received MOUD treatment with naltrexone. During 3-month follow-up, 707 participants (1.7%) experienced an overdose, and 773 (1.9%) had serious opioid-related acute care use. Only treatment with buprenorphine or methadone was associated with a reduced risk of overdose during 3-month (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.24; 95% CI, 0.14-0.41) and 12-month (AHR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31-0.55) follow-up. Treatment with buprenorphine or methadone was also associated with reduction in serious opioid-related acute care use during 3-month (AHR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.99) and 12-month (AHR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.95) follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: Treatment with buprenorphine or methadone was associated with reductions in overdose and serious opioid-related acute care use compared with other treatments. Strategies to address the underuse of MOUD are needed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesics, OpioidBehavior TherapyBuprenorphineComparative Effectiveness ResearchCritical PathwaysFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadone

Identifiers

PMID32022884
PMCPMC11143463
OpenAlexW3005454586

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.