Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022781›Full record

ArticleCancer nursing

Understanding Nutritional Problems of Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Opportunities for Supportive Care Through eHealth.

Dorien L Oostra, Natasha Renee Burse, Laura J Wolf, Erica Schleicher, Scherezade K Mama, Shirley Bluethmann, Kathryn Schmitz, Renate M Winkels

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Technology-based supportive care for metastatic breast cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Trial
  4. Navigating nutritional information while living with metastatic cancer: a qualitative study of patient experiences and needs.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dorien L OostraAuthor Affiliations: Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey (Drs Bluethmann, Schmitz, and Winkels and Mss Oostra, Burse, and Schleicher); and Center for Health Care and Policy Research (Ms Wolf) and Department of Kinesiology (Dr Mama), The Pennsylvania State University, University Park.
Natasha Renee Burse
Laura J Wolf
Erica Schleicher
Scherezade K Mama
Shirley Bluethmann
Kathryn Schmitz
Renate M Winkels
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

Penn State Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR002014 · NCATS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIV HERSHEY MED CTR · PI KRASCHNEWSKI, JENNIFER L. · 2016 to 2025
$33.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetastatic breast cancer patients are now living longer but cope with potential symptoms of metastatic disease and prolonged cancer treatment. Nutrition can play a vital role in managing these sequelae, and eHealth tools are emerging as promising delivery options for nutrition interventions.

objectiveTo qualitatively assess nutritional problems and concerns of women with metastatic breast cancer and to explore how to address these problems within an existing eHealth platform.

methodsSemistructured interviews were conducted with 21 women with metastatic breast cancer participating in an ongoing eHealth study. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a team-based content analysis approach.

resultsMost respondents reported currently or previously experiencing nutritional problems due to adverse effects of cancer treatment or the disease itself; these were rarely addressed during routine clinical care. Five major themes emerged: (1) knowledge about nutrition, (2) nutrition information-seeking, (3) social aspects of nutrition, (4) nutrition interest, and (5) how to address nutrition with an eHealth platform. The respondents reported diverse experiences and perspectives regarding nutrition and diet in the context of metastatic breast cancer within each theme.

conclusionFindings indicate the importance of providing women with metastatic breast cancer with information about nutrition that is tailored to their specific disease, as these patients report both nutritional problems and uncertainty regarding nutritional strategies. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: These findings are a first step toward designing supportive care interventions that could fill the gap related to nutritional concerns not addressed during routine clinical care.

Indexed as

TelemedicineAgedBreast NeoplasmsDietFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNutrition Assessment

Identifiers

PMID32022781
PMCPMC13094776
OpenAlexW3005043430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.