Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022696›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Comparison of Housing First and Traditional Homeless Service Users in Eight European Countries: Protocol for a Mixed Methods, Multi-Site Study.

Ronni Michelle Greenwood, Rachel M Manning, Branagh R O'Shaughnessy, Oisin Cross, Maria J Vargas-Moniz, Pascal Auquier, Massimo Santinello, Judith R Wolf, Anna Bokszczanin, Roberto Bernad and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ronni Michelle Greenwood *Psychology Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1456-0493
Rachel M ManningPsychology Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2254-1484
Branagh R O'ShaughnessyPsychology Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4417-7273
Oisin CrossPsychology Department, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-9093
Maria J Vargas-MonizApplied Psychology Research Center Capabilities and Inclusion, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-9118
Pascal AuquierCentre d'Études et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de Vie, La Timone Medical Campus, School of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3496-1996
Massimo SantinelloDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-328X
Judith R WolfImpuls - Netherlands Center for Social Care Research, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Nijmegen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7106-9142
Anna BokszczaninInstitute of Psychology, Opole University, Opole, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0499-8133
Roberto Bernad *Red de Apoyo a la Integración Sociolaboral Fundacion, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6878-1419
Håkan KällménStockholm Prevents Alcohol and Drug Problems, Stockholm Center for Psychiatry Research and Education, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9288-3864
Frederik SpinnewijnEuropean Federation of National Organisations Working with the Homeless, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2869-3385
José OrnelasApplied Psychology Research Center Capabilities and Inclusion, Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Instituto Universitário, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-7518
HOME_EU Consortium *see Authors' Contributions, .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHomeless services expend considerable resources to provide for service users' most basic needs, such as food and shelter, but their track record for ending homelessness is disappointing. An alternative model, Housing First, reversed the order of services so that homeless individuals are offered immediate access to independent housing, with wraparound supports but no treatment or abstinence requirements. Although the evidence base for Housing First's effectiveness in ending homelessness is robust, less is known about its effectiveness in promoting recovery.

objectiveThe objective of this research is to compare rehabilitation- and recovery-related outcomes of homeless services users who are engaged in either Housing First or traditional staircase services in eight European countries: France, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and Sweden.

methodsA mixed methods, multi-site investigation of Housing First and traditional services will compare quantitative outcomes at two time points. Key rehabilitation outcomes include stable housing and psychiatric symptoms. Key growth outcomes include community integration and acquired capabilities. Semistructured interviews will be used to examine service users' experiences of environmental constraints and affordances on acquired capabilities to identify features of homeless services that enhance service users' capabilities sets. Multi-level modelling will be used to test for group differences-Housing First versus traditional services-on key outcome variables. Thematic analysis will be used to understand the ways in which service users make sense of internal and external affordances and constraints on capabilities.

resultsThe study is registered with the European Commission (registration number: H2020-SC6-REVINEQUAL-2016/ GA726997). Two press releases, a research report to the funding body, two peer-reviewed articles, and an e-book chapter are planned for dissemination of the final results. The project was funded from September 2016 through September 2019. Expected results will be disseminated in 2019 and 2020.

conclusionsWe will use the findings from this research to formulate recommendations for European social policy on the configuration of homeless services and the scaling up and scaling out of Housing First programs. From our findings, we will draw conclusions about the setting features that promote individuals' exits from homelessness, rehabilitation, and recovery. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): RR1-10.2196/14584.

Indexed as

capabilitieshomeless servicesHousing Firstrecovery

Identifiers

PMID32022696
PMCPMC7055843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.