Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022695›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2020

Optimizing Low-Socioeconomic Status Pregnant Women's Dietary Intake in the Netherlands: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.

Yvette H Beulen, Anouk Geelen, Jeanne Hm de Vries, Sabina Super, Maria A Koelen, Edith Jm Feskens, Annemarie Wagemakers

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Understanding empowerment for a healthy dietary intake during pregnancy.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yvette H BeulenHealth and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1725-3648
Anouk GeelenDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1799-4075
Jeanne Hm de VriesDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6495-4207
Sabina SuperHealth and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2586-1953
Maria A KoelenHealth and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-8638
Edith Jm FeskensDivision of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5819-2488
Annemarie WagemakersHealth and Society, Department of Social Sciences, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-6888
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough the importance of maternal nutrition is evident, adherence to dietary guidelines is limited in pregnant women, especially in those with a low socioeconomic status. Promotion of a healthy diet in midwifery practice is promising, as prenatal diet affects both maternal and child health, pregnant women are open to dietary changes during this critical transition, and midwives are their first and most important source of information. Unfortunately, nutrition communication by Dutch midwives is limited.

objectiveThe objective of this study is to optimize the dietary intake of low-socioeconomic status pregnant women by contributing to the further development and adjustment of a tool or toolbox to support midwives in providing nutrition communication.

methodsThis interdisciplinary, mixed-methods study includes 2 phases, in which quantitative and qualitative research are complementary. In phase 1, we will conduct a literature study and interviews to gain insight into midwives' knowledge, needs, and practice. We will obtain data on the dietary intake of low-socioeconomic status pregnant women and factors influencing this intake from another literature study, an interviewer-administered meal-based food frequency questionnaire, and qualitative interviews with pregnant women. We will identify the availability of suitable tools to improve pregnant women's dietary intake from the literature, interviews, focus groups, and expert meetings. In phase 2, we shall adapt an existing tool or develop a new tool(box), depending on the results of phase 1, and implement it in 5 midwifery practices. Ultimately, a process evaluation will provide insight into barriers and facilitating factors playing a role in the implementation of the tool(box).

resultsThe main outcome of this study will be a tool(box) to optimize the dietary intake of Dutch pregnant women. We anticipate that the developed or adjusted tool(s) will be available in February 2020. After we implement the tool(s) and evaluate the implementation process, the final results should be available by February 2021.

conclusionsThis study is scientifically and socially relevant, as we will study low-socioeconomic status pregnant women's contextual dietary intake in-depth from an ecological perspective on health. The results obtained will lead to recommendations for multidisciplinary strategies to promote a healthy maternal dietary intake in low-socioeconomic status populations. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/14796.

Indexed as

health promotionhealthy dietmidwiferynutritionpregnant womensocial class

Identifiers

PMID32022695
PMCPMC7055783
OpenAlexW3004485859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.