Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022688›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

Gradients in the mammalian cerebellar cortex enable Fourier-like transformation and improve storing capacity.

Isabelle Straub, Laurens Witter, Abdelmoneim Eshra, Miriam Hoidis, Niklas Byczkowicz, Sebastian Maas, Igor Delvendahl, Kevin Dorgans, Elise Savier, Ingo Bechmann and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Categorization is 'baked' into the brain.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Cerebellar Cortex.Annual review of neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Isabelle Straub *Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1152-5542
Laurens Witter *Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2357-0578
Abdelmoneim Eshra *Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Miriam Hoidis *Carl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Niklas ByczkowiczCarl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6517-287X
Sebastian MaasCarl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Igor DelvendahlCarl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6151-2363
Kevin DorgansInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1724-6384
Elise SavierInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7512-1630
Ingo BechmannInstitute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Martin KruegerInstitute of Anatomy, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Philippe IsopeInstitut des Neurosciences Cellulaires et Intégratives, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Stefan HallermannCarl-Ludwig-Institute for Physiology, Medical Faculty, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9376-7048
Leipzig University · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRAmsterdam Neuroscience · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebellar granule cells (GCs) make up the majority of all neurons in the vertebrate brain, but heterogeneities among GCs and potential functional consequences are poorly understood. Here, we identified unexpected gradients in the biophysical properties of GCs in mice. GCs closer to the white matter (inner-zone GCs) had higher firing thresholds and could sustain firing with larger current inputs than GCs closer to the Purkinje cell layer (outer-zone GCs). Dynamic Clamp experiments showed that inner- and outer-zone GCs preferentially respond to high- and low-frequency mossy fiber inputs, respectively, enabling dispersion of the mossy fiber input into its frequency components as performed by a Fourier transformation. Furthermore, inner-zone GCs have faster axonal conduction velocity and elicit faster synaptic potentials in Purkinje cells. Neuronal network modeling revealed that these gradients improve spike-timing precision of Purkinje cells and decrease the number of GCs required to learn spike-sequences. Thus, our study uncovers biophysical gradients in the cerebellar cortex enabling a Fourier-like transformation of mossy fiber inputs.

Indexed as

Cerebellar CortexNeuronsAnimalsBiophysical PhenomenaFourier AnalysisMiceModels, NeurologicalNerve FibersPurkinje CellsSynaptic PotentialsWhite Mattercerebellumelectrophysiologygranule cellmossy fibermouseneuroscience

Identifiers

PMID32022688
PMCPMC7002074
OpenAlexW3005166179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.