Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022612›Full record

ArticleThe International journal of artificial organs2021

Validation of numerically simulated ventricular flow patterns during left ventricular assist device support.

Mojgan Ghodrati, Thananya Khienwad, Alexander Maurer, Francesco Moscato, Francesco Zonta, Heinrich Schima, Philipp Aigner

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal of artificial organs, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mojgan GhodratiCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Thananya KhienwadCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Alexander MaurerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Francesco MoscatoCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Francesco ZontaInstitute of Fluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer, Technical University of Vienna, Austria.
Heinrich SchimaCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.
Philipp AignerCenter for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3212-2112
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Cancer Research · ATMedical University of Vienna · ATUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraventricular flow patterns during left ventricular assist device support have been investigated via computational fluid dynamics by several groups. Based on such simulations, specific parameters for thrombus formation risk analysis have been developed. However, computational fluid dynamic simulations of complex flow configurations require proper validation by experiments. To meet this need, a ventricular model with a well-defined inflow section was analyzed by particle image velocimetry and replicated by transient computational fluid dynamic simulations. To cover the laminar, transitional, and turbulent flow regime, four numerical methods including the laminar, standard k-omega, shear-stress transport, and renormalized group k-epsilon were applied and compared to the particle image velocimetry results in 46 different planes in the whole left ventricle. The simulated flow patterns for all methods, except renormalized group k-epsilon, were comparable to the flow patterns measured using particle image velocimetry (absolute error over whole left ventricle: laminar: 10.5, standard k-omega: 11.3, shear-stress transport: 11.3, and renormalized group k-epsilon: 17.8 mm/s). Intraventricular flow fields were simulated using four numerical methods and validated with experimental particle image velocimetry results. In the given setting and for the chosen boundary conditions, the laminar, standard K-omega, and shear-stress transport methods showed acceptable similarity to experimental particle image velocimetry data, with the laminar model showing the best transient behavior.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationHeart-Assist DevicesModels, CardiovascularStress, MechanicalBlood Flow VelocityCardiomyopathy, DilatedHeart VentriclesHumansHydrodynamicsRheologycomputational fluid dynamicsintraventricular flow patternLeft ventricular assist deviceparticle image velocimetryvalidation

Identifiers

PMID32022612
PMCPMC7780364
OpenAlexW3004490774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.