Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022351›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2020

Differences in isolation rate and antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated from foals with sepsis at admission and after ≥48 hours of hospitalization.

Mathijs J P Theelen, W David Wilson, Barbara A Byrne, Judy M Edman, Philip H Kass, Lapo Mughini-Gras, K Gary Magdesian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A retrospective study of equine perinatal loss in Canada (2007 to 2020).The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  6. The fecal bacterial microbiota of healthy and sick newborn foals.Journal of veterinary internal medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mathijs J P TheelenDepartment of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W David WilsonDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Barbara A ByrneDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Judy M EdmanDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Philip H KassDepartment of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
Lapo Mughini-GrasDepartment of Infectious Diseases and Immunity, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
K Gary MagdesianDepartment of Medicine and Epidemiology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California.
University of California, Davis · USUniversity of Applied Sciences Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

University of California, Davis
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntimicrobial treatment protocols for foals with sepsis that do not improve clinically often are adjusted based on bacteriological and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results from samples collected at hospital admission.

objectivesTo evaluate whether hospitalization for ≥48 hours affects bacteriological and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results. ANIMALS: Two-hundred sixty-seven foals <30 days of age admitted to a neonatal intensive care unit and diagnosed with sepsis.

methodsMedical records were reviewed retrospectively to identify foals with sepsis and positive bacteriological cultures. Results from samples collected at hospital admission were compared to those collected ≥48 hours after admission. Logistic regression for clustered data and exact logistic regression were used for statistical analysis.

resultsThree-hundred fifty-three unique bacterial isolates were obtained from 231 foals at hospital admission and 92 unique bacterial isolates were obtained from 57 foals after ≥48 hours of hospitalization. Relative isolation frequency after ≥48 hours of hospitalization increased for Acinetobacter spp., 0.6% versus 3.3% (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-45.45); Enterococcus spp., 4.8% versus 19.6% (OR, 5.37; 95% CI, 2.64-10.90); Klebsiella spp., 5.1% versus 10.9% (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.05-4.89); Pseudomonas spp., 3.0% versus 7.6% (OR, 3.49; 95% CI, 3.49-240.50); and Serratia spp., 3.0% versus 5.4% (OR, 20.23; 95% CI, 2.20-186.14). Bacteria isolated after ≥48 hours of hospitalization were less susceptible to all tested antimicrobial drugs, except for imipenem. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Decreased antimicrobial susceptibility of bacteria isolated after ≥48 hours of hospitalization provides a rationale for repeated bacteriological culture and susceptibility testing in hospitalized foals with sepsis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHorse DiseasesHorsesHospitalizationMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRecordsRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial Agentsamikacinampicillinantimicrobial resistanceceftiofurchloramphenicolenrofloxacingentamicinhealthcare-associated infectionshorsehospital-acquired infectionsimipenemneonatenosocomial infectionspenicillintetracyclinetrimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole

Identifiers

PMID32022351
PMCPMC7096636
OpenAlexW3004492531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.