Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022306›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2020

Survival model methods for analyses of cancer incidence trends in young adults.

Wan Yang, Rebecca D Kehm, Mary Beth Terry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 50% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trends in young-onset cancer incidence: a modeling perspective.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dietary Factors and Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States-an Ecologic Analysis.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wan YangDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7555-9728
Rebecca D KehmDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Mary Beth TerryDepartment of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York.
Columbia University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · US

Funding

Tumor Biology and Microenvironment ProgramP30CA013696 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI JOSEPH G JURCIC · 1985 to 2026
$115.3M
True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ami R Zota · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
Core-001U01CA164920 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Irene Andrulis, Sarah Violet Colonna · 2018 to 2026
$17.0M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR001874 · NCATS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI GENKINGER, JEANINE M., SHIMBO, DAICHI · 2016 to 2025
$13.6M
Training Program in Cancer-related Population SciencesT32CA094061 · NCI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI NEUGUT, ALFRED I., TERRY, MARY BETH · 2017 to 2021
$1.1M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001874NCI NIH HHS P30 CA013696NCI NIH HHS T32 CA094061NCI NIH HHS U01 CA164920NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have reported increases in cancer incidence in adults under 50 years. However, there remains uncertainty about whether these are true increases or a result of incidental findings from increased medical imaging. To evaluate these trends, we propose an alternative method to age-period-cohort analyses based on survival modeling. Simulations show that our method is capable of quantifying cohort effects within various backgrounds including increasing medical imaging. We applied the method to analyze the changes in cancer incidence rates for 44 anatomic sites, stratified by sex, by birth cohort for individuals born from 1945 to 1969 in the US based on incidence data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, and tested the validity of our models using later birth cohorts (1970-1974 and 1975-1979). We found that cancer risks have increased significantly in 15 sites (9 in men and 11 in women) for 25-49 year-olds. These results were consistent with previous findings from age-period-cohort analyses. Furthermore, based on our simulations, these increases were independent of increased medical imaging and support substantial, increased extrinsic risks in the identified cancers. Although our approach has several limitations including the restriction to the younger age range and requirement of complete data for all ages of interest, we demonstrate many advantages of our approach including the ease in implementation and interpretation of cohort effects, robustness to various period backgrounds, and ability to make predictions. Our approach should help epidemiologists evaluate cohort effects using incidence data for cancer or other diseases.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedResearch DesignRiskYoung Adultcancer incidencecancer riskcohort effectsurvival functiontime-trendsyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID32022306
PMCPMC7288576
OpenAlexW3005069322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.