Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022260›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

Cardiac mortality after radiotherapy, chemotherapy and endocrine therapy for breast cancer: Cohort study of 2 million women from 57 cancer registries in 22 countries.

Katherine E Henson, Paul McGale, Sarah C Darby, Max Parkin, Yaochen Wang, Carolyn W Taylor

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katherine E HensonNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paul McGaleNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Sarah C DarbyNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Max ParkinNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Yaochen WangNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.
Carolyn W TaylorNational Cancer Registration and Analysis Service, Public Health England, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1962-6989

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/13/1/30181Cancer Research UK 21133Cancer Research UK C8225/A21133Department of Health 091/0203Medical Research Council MC_U137686858
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comparisons of patients receiving different cancer treatments reflect the effects of both treatment and patient selection. In breast cancer, however, if radiotherapy decisions are unrelated to laterality, comparisons of left-sided and right-sided cancers can demonstrate the causal effects of higher-versus-lower cardiac radiation dose. Cardiac mortality was analysed using individual patient data for 1,934,248 women with breast cancer in 22 countries. The median date of diagnosis was 1996 and the interquartile range was 1987-2002. A total of 1,018,505 women were recorded as irradiated, 223,077 as receiving chemotherapy, 317,619 as receiving endocrine therapy and 55,264 died of cardiac disease. Analyses were stratified by time since breast cancer diagnosis, age at diagnosis, calendar year of diagnosis and country. Patient-selection effects were evident for all three treatments. For radiotherapy, there was also evidence of selection according to laterality in women irradiated 1990 or later. In patients irradiated before 1990, there was no such selection and cardiac mortality was higher in left-sided than right-sided cancer (rate ratio [RR]: 1.13, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.17). Left-versus-right cardiac mortality RRs were greater among younger women (1.46, 1.19, 1.20, 1.09 and 1.08 after cancer diagnoses at ages <40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69 and 70+ years, 2p

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsCardiotoxicityCohort StudiesDrug TherapyFemaleHeart DiseasesHumansMiddle AgedMortalityPatient SelectionRadiotherapyRegistriesUnilateral Breast NeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, Hormonalbreast cancerheart diseaseradiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID32022260
PMCPMC7496256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.