Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32022146›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2020

Resolution, access, and waiting time for specialties in different models of care.

Natália Leite Rosa Mori, Jaime Olbrich Neto, Regina Stella Spagnuolo, Carmen Maria Casquel Monti Juliani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Natália Leite Rosa MoriUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp). Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Programa de Pós-graduação em Enfermagem. Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2022-0292
Jaime Olbrich NetoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp). Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Departamento de Pediatria. Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8804-1530
Regina Stella SpagnuoloUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp). Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Departamento de Enfermagem. Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6977-4165
Carmen Maria Casquel Monti JulianiUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp). Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu. Departamento de Enfermagem. Botucatu, SP, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3734-2317

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to identify the treatment demands coming from primary health care units and, based on that, the demand for referrals to medical specialties in reference services. This study is justified by the scarcity of scientific literature on the subject.

methodsThis is a cross-sectional study using secondary data on the treatments and referrals made by the primary health care units, throughout 2014, in a municipality of the State of São Paulo, Brazil. The total population treated in 2014 was considered, resulting in 411,177 treatments.

resultsOut of all treatments performed, the percentage of referrals was of 4.42%, showing that 95,58% of the problems did not need to be referred to another service. A number of 8,897 referrals were made, to 6,850 users, who were mostly women (60.74%). The mean of referrals per patient was 1.3 (min. 1 and max. 8), and 1,604 patients (23.5%) were referred at least twice.

conclusionsPrimary health care services have been responsible for a large number of treatments, whereas the demand for referrals has decreased, suggesting that such services have established themselves as a gateway to the health system and achieved the expected solvability, although the waiting time for some specialties is very long.

Indexed as

Waiting ListsAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrazilChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID32022146
PMCPMC6986869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.