Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021976›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2020

The chance of recurrence of hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review.

Caitlin R Dean, Claartje M Bruin, Margaret E O'Hara, Tessa J Roseboom, Mariska M Leeflang, René Spijker, Rebecca C Painter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Hyperemesis Gravidarum: Risk of Recurrence in Subsequent Pregnancies.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Caitlin R DeanDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Claartje M BruinDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Margaret E O'HaraPregnancy Sickness Support, 19G Normandy Way, Bodmin, Cornwall, PL31 1RB, UK.
Tessa J RoseboomDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Mariska M LeeflangClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
René SpijkerClinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rebecca C PainterDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Centres Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around 1 % of pregnancies develop Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG), causing high physical and psychological morbidity. Reports on HG recurrence rate in subsequent pregnancies vary widely. An accurate rate of recurrence is needed for informed reproductive decision making. Our objective is to systematically review and aggregate reported rates for HG subsequent to index pregnancies affected by HG. We searched databases from inception as per the protocol registered on PROSPERO. No language restrictions were applied. Inclusion was not restricted based on how HG was defined; reports of severe NVP were included where authors defined the condition as HG. We included descriptive epidemiological, case control and cohort study designs. Eligibility screening was performed in duplo. We extracted data on populations, study methods and outcomes of significance. A panel of patients reviewed the results and provided discussion and feedback. Quality was assessed with the JBI (2017) critical appraisal tool independently by two reviewers. We performed the searches on 1st November 2019. Our search yielded 4454 unique studies, of which five (n = 40,350 HG cases) matched eligibility criteria; One longitudinal and four population-based cohort studies from five countries. Follow-up ranged from 2 to 31 years. Definition of HG and data collection methods in all the studies created heterogeneity. Quality was low; studies lacked valid and reliable exposure, and/or follow-up was insufficient. Meta-analysis was not possible due to clinical and statistical heterogeneity. This systematic review found five heterogeneous studies reporting recurrence rates from 15 to 81%. Defining HG as hospital cases may have introduced detection bias and contribute to clinical heterogeneity. A prospective longitudinal cohort study using an internationally agreed definition of HG and outcomes meaningful to patients is required to establish the true recurrence rate of HG.

Indexed as

Hyperemesis gravidarumNausea and vomiting of pregnancyRecurrence rateReproductive planning

Identifiers

PMID32021976
PMCPMC6994404

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.