Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32021926›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2020

Bacterial colonization of non-permanent central venous catheters in hemodialysis dogs.

Francesca Perondi, Vasilica-Flory Petrescu, Filippo Fratini, Claudio Brovida, Francesco Porciello, Gianila Ceccherini, Ilaria Lippi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca PerondiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Livornese lato monte, San Piero a grado, 56122, Pisa, Italy.
Vasilica-Flory PetrescuDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Filippo FratiniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Livornese lato monte, San Piero a grado, 56122, Pisa, Italy.
Claudio BrovidaANUBI Ospedale per Animali da Compagnia, Strada Genova 299/A, 10024, Monalieri, Italy.
Francesco PorcielloDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Via San Costanzo 4, 06126, Perugia, Italy.
Gianila CeccheriniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Livornese lato monte, San Piero a grado, 56122, Pisa, Italy.
Ilaria LippiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Livornese lato monte, San Piero a grado, 56122, Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-permanent central venous catheters (CVCs), are the most commonly used vascular access in veterinary patients undergoing hemodialysis. In human dialysis patients, CVC infection represents a common cause of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this retrospective observational study was to evaluate the prevalence of bacterial colonization of CVCs in dogs submitted to hemodialysis treatment at time of CVC removal. The CVCs of all dogs submitted to hemodialysis (n = 23) at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital ''Mario Modenato'' of the University of Pisa between January 2015 and December 2016 were considered. For all dogs, data regarding signalment, reason for hemodialysis treatment, duration of catheterization (≤15 or >15 days), CVC complications, and 30-day survival were considered. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad Prism™. Five over 23 dogs (22%) showed positive bacterial culture of CVC (+), and 18/23 dogs (78%) negative culture of CVC (-). The most prevalent microorganism was Staphylococcus Spp (3/5; 60%). No significant difference was found in the prevalence of CVC infection according to age, gender, reason for hemodialysis, CVC complications, duration of catheterization, and outcome. No statistically significant difference (p = 0.64) in survival curves was reported at log rank analysis between dogs with CVC - and CVC +. The prevalence of bacterial CVC contamination in our dialysis dogs showed relatively low. Exclusive use of CVC for hemodialysis, good hygiene practice during CVC management, and use of chlorhexidine as an antiseptic should be strongly encouraged.

Indexed as

Bacterial contaminationBiological sciencesCentral venous catheterDogHemodialysisInternal medicineMicrobiologyNephrologyUrologyVeterinary medicine

Identifiers

PMID32021926
PMCPMC6994843
OpenAlexW3003200249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.