ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2020
CRISPR-Cpf1 Activation of Endogenous
Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- CRISPRi-Mediated Epigenetic Suppression of TERT Reduces Cell Growth in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells.Cells · 2026Article
- A systematic screening assay identifies efficient small guide RNAs for CRISPR activation.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Possibilities and efficiency of MSC co-transfection for gene therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Direct Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Osteoblasts: Techniques and Methodologies.Stem cells translational medicine · 2024Review
- Recent application of CRISPR-Cas12 and OMEGA system for genome editing.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2024Review
- Research Progress on the Osteogenesis-Related Regulatory Mechanisms of Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2023Review
- A Brief Overview of Global Trends in MSC-Based Cell Therapy.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- Article
- Insights of CRISPR-Cas systems in stem cells: progress in regenerative medicine.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for Cartilage Regeneration Applications.Stem cells international · 2022Review
- Umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cells-from bench to bedside.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Psoralen accelerates osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells by activating the TGF-β/Smad3 pathway.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The CRISPR systems provide powerful genome-editing tools for wide applications in biological and medical research fields. However, the safety issue due to off-target effects of CRISPR has been one of the major hindrances of its application to regenerative medicine. The conventional CRISPR system has the intrinsic danger of inducing unpredictable mutations at non-targeted genomic loci via erroneous double-strand DNA breaks (DSBs). In this study, we demonstrate a safety-enhanced application of a recently discovered CRISPR-Cpf1 for targeted gene activation, without DNA double-strand break, to facilitate osteogenic differentiation of human umbilical-cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs). To this end, we developed a catalytically inactive AsCpf1 fused to tripartite transcription activator domain (dAsCpf1-VPR) that can induce upregulation of targeted gene expression in mammalian cells. We observed that the CRISPR-dAsCpf1-VPR activator can be applied to enhance the osteogenic differentiation of human UC-MSCs, via increasing the expression level of endogenous
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.