ArticlePreventive medicine reports2020
Qualitative socioecological factors of cervical cancer screening use among transgender men.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experiences of Inclusion and Exclusion Across the Gynaecological Cancer Continuum for Individuals With Diverse Gender and Sexuality Backgrounds: A Systematic Review.Psycho-oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Barriers to sexual and reproductive health care faced by transgender and gender diverse people: a systematic review.Reproductive health · 2025Pooled it
- Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.BMC women's health · 2021Pooled it
- A qualitative study exploring the primary health care nurses' lived experiences of cervical cancer screening.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Applicability of the levels of the socio-ecological model in the context of cervical cancer prevention: a scoping review.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2026Article
- A Scoping Review Mapping Trans* and Gender Diverse People's Representation in Cancer Research.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Advancing equity in cervical cancer screening for sexual and gender minoritized people assigned female at birth (SGM AFAB) in the United States: recommendations from healthcare equity leaders.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Early detection of cervical and breast cancer in transgender and allogender individuals assigned female at birth: A scoping review.International journal of transgender health · 2025Review
- Inequities in Epilepsy: A Scoping Review.Neurology. Clinical practice · 2023Article
- Factors Associated with Unsatisfactory Pap Tests Among Sexually Active Trans Masculine Adults.LGBT health · 2023Article
- Review of current 2SLGBTQIA+ inequities in the Canadian health care system.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lack of attendance to cervical cancer screening (CCS) services is the most attributable factor to the development of cervical cancer. Transgender men, individuals whose gender identity does match with their natal female sex, use CCS less often than the general female population. The underlying reasons for deficient CCS among transgender men relate mostly to their stigmatized identity, such as discrimination and unwelcoming healthcare environments. However, additional research is needed to expand our understanding of this complex issue. This exploratory qualitative research study aimed to identify the determinants of CCS from the perspective of transgender men. Twenty transgender men ages 21-65 were conveniently sampled to participate in a semi-structured interview in 2018. The data were analyzed using a deductive-inductive content analysis approach and the results were sorted into a socioecological framework (SEM). The participants were mostly non-Hispanic and white. The mean age was 33, and 55% of the sample had attended CCS in the last three years. Eight overarching factors were identified in the data. Each factor included descriptive sub-factors. At the institutional and interpersonal SEM levels, factors related to healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. At the individual level, factors related to past negative experiences, gender identity development, and socioeconomic status. To the investigators' knowledge, this is the first study to report the relationship between gender identity development and CCS behaviors. Gender identity development refers to the transition or coming-out process and gender dysphoria. This suggests that attendance to CCS services change as a transgender person's identity evolves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.