ArticleJournal of blood medicine2020
Potential Undiagnosed VWD Or Other Mucocutaneous Bleeding Disorder Cases Estimated From Private Medical Insurance Claims.
Article in Journal of blood medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- The use of artificial intelligence in the prevention and management of bleeding disorders: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of recombinant von Willebrand factor in on-demand treatment of children with von Willebrand disease: up to 4 years of phase 3/3b follow-up.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Trial
- von Willebrand disease: an illustrated review.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Prophylaxis for von Willebrand disease: Is it time for parity with established practice in hemophilia A?Therapeutic advances in hematology · 2026Review
- Beyond a century of discovery: the global and persistent burden of underdiagnosis in von Willebrand disease.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Review
- Prevalence and Impact of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding in Women With von Willebrand Disease Across Age Groups: A Retrospective Study.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2025Article
- Building the foundation for a community-generated national research blueprint for inherited bleeding disorders: research to advance the health of people with inherited bleeding disorders with the potential to menstruate.Expert review of hematology · 2023Article
- Bleeding patterns in patients before and after diagnosis of von Willebrand disease: Analysis of a US medical claims database.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of Hemophilia · 2022Article
- [ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2021Article
- ASH ISTH NHF WFH 2021 guidelines on the diagnosis of von Willebrand disease.Blood advances · 2021Article
- Exploratory Claims-Based Assessment of Diagnosed and Potentially Undiagnosed von Willebrand Disease in Japan.Haemophilia : the official journal of the World Federation of HemophiliaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVon Willebrand disease (VWD) is a common inherited bleeding disorder, but awareness among health care professionals is low. We estimated the number of cases of undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders among commercially insured patients in the United States with a recent history of bleeding events.
methodsPatients with a VWD diagnosis who were users of or candidates for von Willebrand factor replacement were identified from the IMS PharMetrics Plus Database (2006-2015). We constructed a unary patient-finding model based on 12 prediagnosis variables that best defined this population, and applied this to undiagnosed patients with recent bleeding events from the same database. Cases of symptomatic undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders in the commercially insured population were estimated from the "best fit" (positive predictive value [PPV] 83%) and "good fit" (PPV 75%) patients thus identified.
resultsOverall, 507,668 undiagnosed patients with recent bleeding events were identified (86% female, 14% male). Application of the VWD model identified 3318 best-fit and 37,163 good-fit patients; 91% of best-fit patients were females aged <46 years, with heavy menstrual bleeding as the most common claim. Projection to the full commercially insured US population suggested that 35,000-387,000 patients may have symptomatic, undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorders. DISCUSSION: Computer modeling suggests there may be a significant number of patients with symptomatic, undiagnosed VWD or other mucocutaneous bleeding disorder in the commercially insured population. Enhanced awareness of VWD symptoms and their impact, and of screening and testing procedures, may improve the diagnosis of VWD and reduce disease burden.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.